[Clas12_software] ced 1.006 with better CND data display

[David Heddle]

Maurizio,
Yes I can do that.

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 1:20 PM Maurizio Ungaro <ungaro at jlab.org wrote:

> Perhaps CED could use the database to check which sectors are present in a
> run period? David let me know if that is feasible I can prepare a CCDB
> table.
>
> If they’re present they should be displayed in CED I think, especially
> when they’ll be filled with the heavy gas and show a good signal.
>
> Mauri
>
>
>
> > On Nov 11, 2018, at 12:39 PM, L Smith <lcs1956 at me.com> wrote:
> >
> > Mikhail,
> >
> > Maybe Mauri would disagree with you about removing LTCC from CED.
> >
> > Cole
> >
> >> On Nov 11, 2018, at 7:46 AM, Mikhail Osipenko <osipenko at jlab.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >> eventually I understood my mistake: these two layers that I associated
> to FTOFs were actually LTCC! Sorry about that! Perhaps you might remove
> them, they are not there at least in most of the sectors and there is no
> use of them in on-line event display...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>         Mikhail.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Mikhail Osipenko wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Dave,
> >>>
> >>> there are some hits in FTOF (it is made of those two rows of bigger
> tiles just after DC R3, right?), but 1) for most tracks which you see both
> in DC (before FTOF) and in PCAL+EC (after FTOF) there are no hits in FTOF!
> They must be there, moreover there must be a lot of random noise: FTOF is
> counting few x100 kHz. Are you sure you plotting all hits? Is there any
> threshold or requirement of two side L-R reconstruction?
> >>>
> >>> I would expect for every DC track to see the corresponding FTOF hit
> (plus random noise), if it is not there we will not be able to reconstruct
> anything.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>>           Mikhail.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, David Heddle wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I just went to the counting house and the FTOF hit rate on ced looked
> >>>> normal. Not sure what else to do...
> >>>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 11:21 AM David Heddle <david.heddle at cnu.edu>
> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I just looked at
> >>>>>
> /lustre/expphy/cache/clas12/rg-a/data/clas_005460/clas_005460.evio.00049
> >>>>> from today, and I see the usual number of FTOF hits. I will go to the
> >>>>> counting house and check the on-line. An accumulation of 10k events
> looks
> >>>>> normal
> >>>>> [image: image.png]
> >>>>> David
> >>>>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 7:19 AM David Heddle <david.heddle at cnu.edu>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> I will check!
> >>>>>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018, 5:52 AM Mikhail Osipenko <osipenko at jlab.org
> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Dear Dave,
> >>>>>>> are all FTOF hits shown for each event in CED? I looked both: the
> >>>>>>> on-line
> >>>>>>> visualization in counting house from ET-ring and off-line data
> files,
> >>>>>>> apparently there are almost no FTOF hits. Perhaps one every 100
> events.
> >>>>>>> Even for very clear electron tracks with huge EC cluster the
> crossed
> >>>>>>> FTOF
> >>>>>>> does not show anything. I hope it is just visualization problem
> and has
> >>>>>>> nothing to do with detector performance?
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>           Mikhail.
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> *David P. Heddle, Ph.D.Professor of Physics*
> >>>>> *MS APCS Graduate Program Coordinator*
> >>>>> * Christopher Newport University Newport News, VA 23606*
> >>>>> *757.594.8434*
> >>>> --
> >>>> *David P. Heddle, Ph.D.Professor of Physics*
> >>>> *MS APCS Graduate Program Coordinator*
> >>>> * Christopher Newport University Newport News, VA 23606*
> >>>> *757.594.8434*
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Clas12_software mailing list
> >>> Clas12_software at jlab.org
> >>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_software
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Clas12_software mailing list
> >> Clas12_software at jlab.org
> >> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_software
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Clas12_software mailing list
> > Clas12_software at jlab.org
> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_software
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_software mailing list
> Clas12_software at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_software
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_software/attachments/20181111/b0d412e9/attachment-0002.html>