[Clas12_software] [EXTERNAL] Data and MC processed with AI-assisted tracking

Mon Aug 23 12:58:39 EDT 2021

Dear All,
Thanks a lot to Daniel and Stepan for analyzing the newly processed data. If you are available, we could discuss these results (as well as others that may be available) at this week software meeting.

Meanwhile, we have been doing some checks to understand the difference Stepan found when comparing the J/psi yield to pass1 and we can discuss that as well.

For anyone interested in looking at these data, we have also run trains on the A and B samples using the last train configuration adopted by RG-A. Outputs are available in 
/volatile/clas12/users/clas12/mlt11/dst/trainA
/volatile/clas12/users/clas12/mlt11/dst/trainB
See /volatile/clas12/users/clas12/mlt11/dst/trainA/dstai/train/README.json for the train configuration.
Best regards,
	Raffaella

> On 23 Aug 2021, at 01:48, Valery Kubarovsky <vpk at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> Dan,
> I don't see any fits in your plot. Do you count just the number of the events to compare A and B?
> Thanks,
> Valery
> 
> 
> From: Clas12_software <clas12_software-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Nathan Baltzell <baltzell at jlab.org>
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 16:42
> To: Daniel Carman <carman at jlab.org>
> Cc: clas12 software <clas12_software at jlab.org>; Raffaella De Vita <raffaella.devita at ge.infn.it>
> Subject: Re: [Clas12_software] [EXTERNAL] Data and MC processed with AI-assisted tracking
>  
> Hello Daniel,
> 
> Please use the A/B nomenclature provided and do not arbitrarily assign AI/CONV.
> 
> -Nathan
> 
> 
>> On Aug 21, 2021, at 3:18 PM, Daniel Carman <carman at jlab.org <mailto:carman at jlab.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Folks,
>> 
>> I have compared the new cooking of RG-A fall 2018 inbending data with conventional tracking and AI-assisted
>> tracking. The results of my study are attached in terms of 4 plots for MM(e’K+) using the skim14 kaon skim
>> files with the electron in the ECAL.
>> 
>> UL: e’K+(FD) - AI has 19% more events
>> UR: e’K+(FD)p(FD) - AI has 28% more events
>> LL: e’K+(FD)p(CD) - AI has 14% more events
>> LR: e’K+(CD)p(FD) - AI has 18% more events
>> 
>> Here FD implies hadron detection in the Forward Detector and CD implies hadron detection in the Central Detector.
>> I have used the same run numbers in both studies. I also compared same distributions from the recently cooked files
>> to the same runs with the original pass-1 cooking for the convention tracking. The number of events for the different
>> distributions agrees to within a few percent.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Daniel
>> 
>> *****************************************************************************
>> *
>> * Dr. Daniel Carman              e-mail: carman at jlab.org <mailto:carman at jlab.org>                   
>> * Staff Scientist                 office: (757)-269-5586
>> * Jefferson Laboratory       web: http://userweb.jlab.org/~carman <http://userweb.jlab.org/~carman>
>> *
>> *****************************************************************************
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 20, 2021, at 5:43 PM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org <mailto:stepanya at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> My studies of J/psi yield with new processed 31 runs are not complete, I am missing one run, 5126, for the skim1 of the trainA (reconA) but want to share the results that I have.  Attached are 3 distributions of the e+e- invariant mass. The old one is what we have from the pass1 processing, using just the 31 runs that have been processed for the AI-assisted tracking test. The new A is from the trainA (reconA) and the new B is from trainB (reconB). So, B has ~25% more J/psi’s than the pass1, A has about 25% less but, of course, with 1 run missing.
>>> 
>>> Regards, Stepan
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   
>>> 
>>> > On Aug 20, 2021, at 7:11 AM, Raffaella De Vita <raffaella.devita at ge.infn.it <mailto:raffaella.devita at ge.infn.it>> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > Dear All,
>>> > Following the discussion at the software meeting of few weeks ago, significant statistics for both real data and MC (sidis) was processed with AI-assisted tracking to allow analyses of different final states and comparison to conventional tracking.
>>> > 
>>> > For both real data and MC, two sets of DSTs files were produced, one based on conventional tracking and one based on AI-assisted tracking.
>>> > 
>>> > The real data samples from RG-A Fall18 unbending are available in:
>>> > /volatile/clas12/users/clas12/mlt11/dst/reconA/
>>> > /volatile/clas12/users/clas12/mlt11/dst/reconB/
>>> > 
>>> > The MC data samples, in RG-A Fall18 unbending configuration, are available in:
>>> > /volatile/clas12/users/devita/mlt11/reconA
>>> > /volatile/clas12/users/devita/mlt11/reconB
>>> > In these two folders, the nobg and bg folders contain reconstruction outputs with pure sidis events and after merging with 45nA background.
>>> > 
>>> > Let me know if you have any question.
>>> > Best regards,
>>> >        Raffaella
>>> > 
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Clas12_software mailing list
>>> > Clas12_software at jlab.org <mailto:Clas12_software at jlab.org>
>>> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_software <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_software>
>>> 
>>> <in_old31_557.pdf><in_newa30_557.pdf><in_newb31_557.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>> Clas12_software mailing list
>>> Clas12_software at jlab.org <mailto:Clas12_software at jlab.org>
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_software <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_software>
>> <ai-conv-study.pdf><smime.p7s>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_software/attachments/20210823/4cca40e4/attachment-0001.html>