[Clas12_verystrange] Cascade comparison

[Igor Strakovsky]

Mike,

How is about to use Johann's result as well.  Johann, can you please
provide Mike your figures?

Thanks, Igor


On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:27:56 -0500 (EST), Michael Dugger <dugger at jlab.org> 
wrote:

> 
> John,
> 
> I was just trying to get a feel for the background to expect and 
> quickly found your results off the web. No big deal. I will start using 
> Lei's stuff.
> 
> As far as the backgrounds go, we just need some way to verify that they 
> look reasonable.
> 
> I am new to this strange stuff and have not committed to memory what the 
> latest and best results are.
> 
> Please bear with me as I get up to speed.
> 
> Take care,
> Michael
> 
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, John Price wrote:
> 
>> Hi Mike:
>>
>> I haven't been able to participate in the meetings lately (see my message of 
>>a few minutes ago); why are you comparing to my results rather than Lei Guo's 
>>from 2007, which are probably superior in every way?
>>
>> John
>>
>> --
>> John W. Price
>> Professor and Chair of Physics
>> CSU Dominguez Hills
>> 310-243-3403
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Dugger <dugger at jlab.org>
>> Sender: "clas12_verystrange-bounces at jlab.org"
>> 	<clas12_verystrange-bounces at jlab.org>
>> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:53:52
>> To: clas12_verystrange at jlab.org<clas12_verystrange at jlab.org>
>> Reply-To: "clas12_verystrange at jlab.org" <clas12_verystrange at jlab.org>
>> Subject: [Clas12_verystrange] Cascade comparison
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have attached a plot of Cascade-(1321) using the same code that I used
>> to generate the Omega- (cascadeM.gif). The plot is the missing mass
>> spectrum (MassX) from the reaction:
>> gamma p -> K+ K+ X
>>
>> I have also included plots from John Price's paper showing the same
>> spectrum from g6 data (PriceCascade.png).
>>
>> The incident photon energy range for the g6 experiment is, of course,
>> different than what CLAS12 will have, however, the signal to background
>> ratio I get in my plot looks somewhat consistent with what John saw from
>> g6 data.
>>
>> Perhaps the simulated backgrounds are not too far off from reality?
>>
>> Take care,
>> Michael