[Clas12_verystrange] pac results

[Lei Guo]

On the PAC internal page, you can find the following description:

   The PAC may conditionally approve proposals when additional  
requirements must be fulfilled before full approval is granted. There  
are two categories of conditional approval:

C2 - must return to the PAC to address concerns or issues to obtain  
approval,
C1 - must meet designated technical requirements to obtain approval  
from laboratory management - further PAC review is not required.
The rule for newly conditionally approved 12 GeV proposals is that  
they must return for approval at one of the next 2 consecutive PAC  
meetings following the PAC at which they received the conditional  
approval status.

Proposals that received C2 status at a previous PAC may return to  
PAC39 to be considered for approval. Proposals with previous  
conditional approval (C2) that wish to be considered for approval at  
PAC39 should submit an updated proposal and will be granted a 20- 
minute presentation at the PAC meeting. Following the public  
presentation session the PAC will continue its discussions in closed  
session, and at least one spokesperson should be available either in  
person or by phone for 24 hours after the public session to answer  
questions as the PAC's discussion progresses. If approved, the  
proposals will be considered for rating along with the other approved  
proposals in the grading session.





This means we will have to return to one of the two next PAC.

Lei

On Jun 22, 2012, at 2:01 PM, Bill Briscoe wrote:


>
> What is difference between C1 and C2?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: clas12_verystrange-bounces at jlab.org
> [mailto:clas12_verystrange-bounces at jlab.org] On Behalf Of Lei Guo
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 1:53 PM
> To: clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> Subject: [Clas12_verystrange] pac results
>
> PAC results is already available at
> http://www.jlab.org/exp_prog/PACpage/PAC39/PAC39_Results.pdf
> , we are only conditionally approved (C2). :( I will find out more  
> later.
> Since it is not defer or reject, I guess this is still acceptable.
>
> Thanks for the hard work that everyone has put into this proposal.
>
> Lei
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_verystrange/attachments/20120622/2a6b3a92/attachment-0002.html>