[Clas12_verystrange] pac results

[Eugene Pasyuk]

Yet another stupid idea: Can we detect and identify K^- in forward 
micromegas, FT tracker and FT?

-Eugene


On 6/22/12 15:13 , Eugene Pasyuk wrote:
> Yes, we got a home work to do. Here is a brief summary.
>
> There are two issues which are needed to be addressed and presented to 
> PAC again.
>
>  1.  Half field vs. full field running requested by other experiments.
>     Together with other experiments we need to look at various scenarios:
>      1. part time full field part time half field.
>      2. some intermediate field setting? 75%?
>      3. two region tracking for forward going K^- ?
>      4. what is the impact of lower field on others? I've already
>         talked briefly with Victor about N* transition form factor
>         experiment. They will look into it. We need to talk with DVCS
>         people as well.
>      5. .....
>  2. Issue of efficiency of Kaon ID. We discussed this at our meetings
>     but never completed this study. We need to finish this.
>
> Ideally we should run simulation with full reconstruction to answer 
> all those questions.
>
> -Eugene
>
>
> On 6/22/12 14:11 , Lei Guo wrote:
>> On the PAC internal page, you can find the following description:
>>
>>   The PAC may conditionally approve proposals when additional 
>> requirements must be fulfilled before full approval is granted. There 
>> are two categories of conditional approval:
>>
>>   * C2 - must return to the PAC to address concerns or issues to
>>     obtain approval,
>>   * C1 - must meet designated technical requirements to obtain
>>     approval from laboratory management - further PAC review is not
>>     required.
>>
>> The rule for newly conditionally approved 12 GeV proposals is that 
>> they must return for approval at one of the next 2 consecutive PAC 
>> meetings following the PAC at which they received the conditional 
>> approval status.
>>
>> Proposals that received C2 status at a previous PAC may return to 
>> PAC39 to be considered for approval. Proposals with previous 
>> conditional approval (C2) that wish to be considered for approval at 
>> PAC39 should submit an updated proposal and will be granted a 
>> 20-minute presentation at the PAC meeting. Following the public 
>> presentation session the PAC will continue its discussions in closed 
>> session, and at least one spokesperson should be available either in 
>> person or by phone for 24 hours after the public session to answer 
>> questions as the PAC's discussion progresses. If approved, the 
>> proposals will be considered for rating along with the other approved 
>> proposals in the grading session.
>>
>>
>>
>> This means we will have to return to one of the two next PAC.
>>
>> Lei
>>
>> On Jun 22, 2012, at 2:01 PM, Bill Briscoe wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> What is difference between C1 and C2?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: clas12_verystrange-bounces at jlab.org 
>>> <mailto:clas12_verystrange-bounces at jlab.org>
>>> [mailto:clas12_verystrange-bounces at jlab.org] On Behalf Of Lei Guo
>>> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 1:53 PM
>>> To: clas12_verystrange at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_verystrange at jlab.org>
>>> Subject: [Clas12_verystrange] pac results
>>>
>>> PAC results is already available at
>>> http://www.jlab.org/exp_prog/PACpage/PAC39/PAC39_Results.pdf
>>> , we are only conditionally approved (C2). :( I will find out more 
>>> later.
>>> Since it is not defer or reject, I guess this is still acceptable.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the hard work that everyone has put into this proposal.
>>>
>>> Lei
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
>>> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
>>> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
>> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_verystrange/attachments/20120622/168a13c7/attachment-0002.html>