[Clas12_verystrange] Meeting time

John Price jprice at csudh.edu
Sun Mar 18 16:14:27 EDT 2012


On a more serious note, related to my last comment: 

The new poll contains times going up to only 11AM JLab time every day.
Given the time difference between the coasts, and various
childcare-related issues that pertain only to me, it is very unlikely
that the time eventually selected by the group as a whole will be one
during which I am available.  What, then, would be expected of me from
this group?  I was invited to participate some time ago, and I am happy
to do so, but it seems that nearly every meeting ever held has been at a
time I am unavailable; this makes it difficult for me to fathom what,
exactly, I can contribute.

John

On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Dugger wrote:
> Eugene,
> 
> I think that we all understand that the chosen time may not work for any 
> one particular individual. My complaint was that the group seemed to 
> ignore the agreed upon time. For some reason, the 13:00 Monday time does 
> not work, and we ended up having meetings at 11:30 or 12:00. Since we are 
> no longer using the agreed upon time, it makes sense for us to pick a new 
> time. (Who knows, perhaps the new time will be beneficial to the Edinburgh 
> group and not work well for us in the Western US.)
> 
> If the new time that the group chooses does not work for me, I promise not 
> to complain.
> 
> Thanks for setting up the new poll.
> 
> Take care,
> Michael
> 
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012, Eugene Pasyuk wrote:
> 
> > So, the next meeting is tomorrow. When do we meet tomorrow? 13:00 EDT or
> > 11:30 or something else? I set up new poll for meeting time for next
> > weeks http://www.doodle.com/k8ddu4fb4mnbbiqx
> > The geography of collaborators spans from Los Angeles to Edinburgh and
> > even further to Italy. This shrinks the range of acceptable time.
> >
> > -Eugene
> >
> >
> >
> > Michael Dugger wrote, On 03/18/12 00:12:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm sure that, as Bill stated, "no harm was meant".
> >>
> >> I was just feeling like John Price and I were not being treated fairly.
> >>
> >> This is a simple problem with a simple solution. Let us, as a group,
> >> decide on a new meeting time.
> >>
> >> No harm. No foul.
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012, Bill Briscoe wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear All,
> >>>
> >>> May I suggest that we should not worry worry about obvious misspoken
> >>> words, I am sure no harm was meant.
> >>>
> >>> Bill
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Michael Dugger<dugger at jlab.org>  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Lei,
> >>>>
> >>>> Can I get a list as to who are the "main people". Also, I'd like to know
> >>>> the criteria for being included in such a list. I think that would be
> >>>> entertaining.
> >>>>
> >>>> Take care,
> >>>> Michael
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012, Lei Guo wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi, Michael,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The time voted on doodle was 12:00pm. SOme folks at JLAB had conflict
> >>>>> (software meeting?) so it was changed to 11:30. BUt if the main people
> >>>>> are OK with 12:00pm, or at least attend part of the meeting, then I
> >>>>> think we can switch back to 12:00pm (EST)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lei
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mar 16, 2012, at 9:54 PM, Michael Dugger wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I would like that we figure out a new meeting time. The time that we
> >>>>>> meet does not seem very stable, and is not the time that was voted on
> >>>>>> using the Doodle Poll.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Take care,
> >>>>>> Michael
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> >>>>>> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> >>>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> >>>>> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> >>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> >>>> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> >>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> William J. Briscoe
> >>> Department of Physics
> >>> The George Washington University
> >>> Director, GW Institute for Nuclear Studies (GWINS)
> >>> Director, Data Analysis Center (DAC)
> >>> 202-994-6788 (Foggy Bottom Campus)
> >>> 703-726-8340 (Virginia Science and Technology Campus)
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> >>> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> >>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> >> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> >> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
> > _______________________________________________
> > Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> > Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
-- 
John W. Price
Professor and Chair of Physics
CSU Dominguez Hills
310-243-3403




More information about the Clas12_verystrange mailing list