[Clas12_verystrange] dry run comments
Lei Guo
lguo at jlab.org
Fri May 25 15:44:36 EDT 2012
Hi, Strangers,
The dry run was very useful. I need to work on the organization of the
slides to better make our case.
A couple of specific comments are very important.
1. Volker said it would not look very good simply asking for 80 beam
days because that's what the meson experiment got approved for. I
think we can justify the beam time from the omega- differential cross
sections. For example, if we want to at least be able to tell the
forward-backward behavior of the Omega- in c.m. frame, we need have
certain maximum allowable statistical uncertainty. Say, we bin our
results in at least 5 (or more) angle bins, and 5 energy bins, how
does the statistical uncertainty (Or the difference between the
forward/backward bins) change as a function of beam time. Any other
suggestions?
2. Magnetic field setting. It was mentioned at the dry run that the
meson people might want to run it at full field. Maybe Derek can
confirm that? In any case, we might want to have a set of table of
expected rates based on the full field simulation.
3. The expected results for Xi- polarization measurement (I think we
already have the projected numbers, just need to obtain the proper
uncertainty) -- and the xi(1820) double moments-- both are missing.
Please let me know if you have any more comments and suggestions. I
will have the proposal at our svn depository whenever it is updated. I
shall have another version next week (I will be at JLAB)
Lei
**************************************
@
/ *
/ ___ ___ Lei Guo _______________________
L_O_/ ____ Florida International University____/_/
\ | Physics Dept., CP
212 / /
/ \ | Miami, FL
33199 / / /
/ I_/ \ ____ USA _____ /______/__________/ /
/ /
L
/ / / / /
/ / / / / / /
/_/__________/______/______/__________/_/
/_/__________/______/______/__________/_/
305-348-0234(o)
**************************************
More information about the Clas12_verystrange
mailing list