[Clas12_verystrange] proposal comments

[dugger at jlab.org]

Hi,

I am available Friday

-Michael

> How many people can meet Friday?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 7, 2013, at 8:34 PM, Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org> wrote:
>
>> Most of the comments are easy to answer. Only one comment requires some
>> work. This is about trigger in case of untagged real photon. I  guess
>> this question came from Marco.
>> This is legitimate concern we should address. Simple two prong trigger
>> with no FT will overwhelm DAq.
>> The trigger may be [2-prong AND FT]OR[4-prong] We nee to look what is
>> the rate of 4-prong events. compared to 2-prong AND FT.
>> I guess this asks for some simulation.
>>
>> -Eugene
>>
>> From: "Lei Guo" <lguo at jlab.org>
>> To: "clas12 verystrange" <clas12_verystrange at jlab.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 5:43:36 PM
>> Subject: [Clas12_verystrange] proposal comments
>>
>> Hi, All,
>>
>> I have received the comments from Ken. Most are minor comments. There is
>> a bit of problem in the trigger/untagged photon rate that could be due
>> to some miscalculation.
>>
>> Let's look at the comments and meet this Friday? Or maybe sooner?
>>
>> Lei
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
>> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
>> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_verystrange mailing list
> Clas12_verystrange at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_verystrange
>