[Clas12_verystrange] FW: FT-based PID

[Eugene Pasyuk]

From: Raffaella De Vita <devita at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 12:29
To: Nathan Baltzell <baltzell at jlab.org>; Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>; Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it>; Lucilla Lanza <lucilla.lanza at roma2.infn.it>; William Phelps <wphelps at jlab.org>; Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org>; Derek Glazier <Derek.Glazier at glasgow.ac.uk>; Marco Battaglieri <battaglieri at ge.infn.it>
Subject: Re: FT-based PID

Now with the attachment.


> On 26 Feb 2019, at 18:28, Raffaella De Vita <devita at jlab.org<mailto:devita at jlab.org>> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> I have continued working on testing different PID schemes for events with no electrons in the FD but in the FT.
> I have included in attachment a set of slides summarizing the results. Basically, I compared the results obtained by using simply the most energetic electron in the FT with what obtained by looking for the best time coincidence between FT electrons and tracks in the FD. The latter is quite similar to what was done in CLAS for photon runs.
> My preference, based on the results, would be for the second algorithm but, to conclude, it would be good to test it on some exclusive final state to see what the performance are.
> Let me know if you have comments or suggestions.
> Best regards,
>        Raffaella
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_verystrange/attachments/20190226/c4ee8766/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 20190226_ftpid.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 683404 bytes
Desc: 20190226_ftpid.pdf
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_verystrange/attachments/20190226/c4ee8766/attachment-0001.pdf>