[Clas_cascades] Minutes 11/3/2010

Alex Kubarovsky kubarovsky at gmail.com
Fri Nov 5 18:52:09 EDT 2010


Hi Hovanes,

Thank you, so how one can distinguish those states?

Thanx, Alex

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Hovanes Egiyan <hovanes.egiyan at gmail.com>wrote:

>  Hi Alex,
>
> there are  two 4-star Lambda-states there that can
> couple to NK system, Lambda(1820) and Lambda(1830).
> Both of them are about 80-100 MeV wide.
> For the Lambda(1820) KN decay is the favorite channel.
> And there are also other 3-star Lambda-states listed in PDG.
>
> Hovanes.
>
>
>
> On 11/05/2010 12:46 AM, Alex Kubarovsky wrote:
>
> Dear Zhiwen,
>
>  On your plots there is prominent near 1.85 GeV, is it Lamda(1820) or
> other Lambda with the mass in this region?
>
>  Thanx, Alex.
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Zhiwen Zhao <zwzhao at jlab.org> wrote:
>
>> The attached files shows the nucleon MM of K0 in PrtK0Km channel and Kp in
>> PrtKpKm channel.
>> The MM is in the first column, the InvM of pkm is second, and the third
>> shows one versus the other
>> The top row is after nucleon missing mass cut, the bottom row is after
>> further cut on nucleon missing momentum at 200MeV.
>> Overall the MM plot has much worse resolution than the InvM plot around
>> Lambda1520 and the xk0 has worse resolution than xkp
>>
>> Those MM plots have no "fermi correction" as I showed in the meeting
>> because I think the method I used is not good.
>>
>> Zhiwen
>>
>>
>> On 11/04/2010 01:49 PM, Elton Smith wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> resent: Elton, Hovanes, Zhiwen, Stepan
>>> On the phone:  Ralf, Kijun<br>
>>> Notes by Elton.
>>>
>>> == Announcements==
>>> # No meeting next week due to the collaboration meeting.
>>>
>>> == Draft of Phi-- Paper (Hovanes) ==
>>> # Hovanes uploaded a new version a couple of days ago.
>>> # Stepan has provided comments. Elton made suggestions to the section on
>>> upper limits.
>>> # Kijun has some comments he will send in. Ralf will try to finish
>>> reading
>>> the draft today.
>>> # Ralf: Abstract mentions the Lambda pipi mass spectrum, but it is not in
>>> the paper. We discussed this and concluded that it should be taken out of
>>> the abstract but nevertheless the figure should be added to the paper. It
>>> will make it easier to explain the steps to obtaining Fig. 10.
>>> # Hovanes suggested changing the title to  "upper limits for
>>> photoproduction cross section of Phi--". No strong opinions were offered.
>>> # Generally, we all need to review the title, abstract and conclusion
>>> section once the paper is close to final.
>>>
>>> == Analysis note for Lambda(1520) (Zhiwen) ==
>>> # Recoil spectra of MM(K), requested by Igor were shown for both MM(K0)
>>> in
>>> gn(p)->pK-K0(p) and also for MM(K+) in gp(n)->pK-K+(n). In both cases the
>>> Fermi momentum blurrs the Lambda peak. The invariant mass of pK- has much
>>> better resolution. In both cases a correction for the Fermi momentum is
>>> obtained by MM of all three detected particles.
>>> # Ralf: The Fermi momentum distribution is fairly accurately reproduced,
>>> so it is surprising that the resolution of the pK- invariant mass is not
>>> mostly recovered. This was discussed without final conclusion, except
>>> that
>>> it is likely that the resolution in missing momentum is poor compared to
>>> that required for computing the invariant mass. Ralf suggested that the
>>> generated Fermi momentum be smeared with expected detector resolution to
>>> see how much it changes the distribution.
>>> # [http://www.jlab.org/~zwzhao/totalXsection_high.gif<http://www.jlab.org/%7Ezwzhao/totalXsection_high.gif>Total cross section
>>> for Lambda(1520)] plotted vs energy, shows a large discrepancy in the
>>> lowers energy point (1.75-2GeV). The estimated cross section is about
>>> 3+/-1 micro b cross section oompared to about 0.8 microb from other data.
>>> No systematic errors are included, and no bin-centering corrections.
>>> # Suggestions on what to look for are: check the kinematic cover of the
>>> bins at high -t. Check bin-centering corrections. Consider differences of
>>> cross section measure with/without phi cut as a measure of the sytematic
>>> uncertainty.
>>>
>>>
>>> == Next Meeting Nov 18, 8:00 am ==
>>> # Phi-- Draft of paper (Hovanes)
>>> # Lambda(1520) update (Zhiwen)
>>>
>>>
>>> Elton Smith
>>> Jefferson Lab MS 12H5
>>> 12000 Jefferson Ave
>>> Suite # 16
>>> Newport News, VA 23606
>>> elton at jlab.org
>>> (757) 269-7625
>>> (757) 269-6331 fax
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Clas_cascades mailing list
>>> Clas_cascades at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_cascades
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas_cascades mailing list
>> Clas_cascades at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_cascades
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas_cascades mailing listClas_cascades at jlab.orghttps://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_cascades
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas_cascades mailing list
> Clas_cascades at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_cascades
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas_cascades/attachments/20101105/4714712a/attachment.html 


More information about the Clas_cascades mailing list