[Clas_cascades] Fwd: Re: Phi-- fourth round of Ad Hoc review

[Zhiwen Zhao]

Total awesomeness!

For Lambda1520 note, I finished most part of the reply to the committe 
comment, still working on systematics part.
Hopefully I can do it by next week. Then we may have a meeting.
I will let you know around this weekend

Thanks

Zhiwen


On 07/13/2011 03:44 PM, Hovanes Egiyan wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: Phi-- fourth round of Ad Hoc review
> Date: 	Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:28:10 -0400
> From: 	Reinhard Schumacher <schumacher at cmu.edu> <mailto:schumacher at cmu.edu>
> To: 	Hovanes Egiyan <hovanes.egiyan at gmail.com>
> <mailto:hovanes.egiyan at gmail.com>
> CC: 	Angela Biselli <biselli at jlab.org> <mailto:biselli at jlab.org>, Jerry
> Gilfoyle <ggilfoyl at richmond.edu> <mailto:ggilfoyl at richmond.edu>, Marco
> Ripani <Marco.Ripani at ge.infn.it> <mailto:Marco.Ripani at ge.infn.it>, Ken
> Hicks <hicks at ohio.edu> <mailto:hicks at ohio.edu>
>
>
>
> Hello Hovanes,
> 	The Ad Hoc committee for the Phi--(1860) paper that you are leading met
> again to consider the 4th round of revisions.  All of our questions and
> other issues have been addressed.  The committee is now fully satisfied
> with the paper.  We think it should now move to the final
> Collaboration-wide review.  Congratulations, and good luck.
>
> For the Committee,
> Reinhard
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Reinhard Schumacher         Department of Physics, 5000 Forbes Ave.
> Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A.
> phone: 412-268-5177         web: www-meg.phys.cmu.edu/~schumach
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Reinhard Schumacher wrote:
>>  Hello Hovanes,
>>      Since you sent us the 4th revision of the phi-- paper on June 3,
>>  the Ad Hoc committee has had no chance to meet to discuss the work.  For
>>  the bulk of that time it was me who was unavailable on vacation,
>>  followed by the CLAS meeting last week when we also did not meet.  Now
>>  the other members of the committee are traveling for a couple of weeks.
>>  Thus, progress has been slow this summer.
>>
>>      Pending approval by the whole committee, I can mention that I've now
>>  gone over the "Response to the third round of comments" that you sent.
>>  To me it looks that you have clarified all the remaining points that
>>  were raised previously.  The discussion in the appendix of how you
>>  arrived at the upper limits is now in a state where I could work out the
>>  details based on what is given in the paper.  However, before proceeding
>>   we must have a consensus on the committee.   I believe we can reach
>>  that by the middle of July.
>>
>>  Sincerely,
>>  Reinhard
>>
>>  ___________________________________________________________________
>>  Reinhard Schumacher         Department of Physics, 5000 Forbes Ave.
>>  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A.
>>  phone: 412-268-5177         web: www-meg.phys.cmu.edu/~schumach
>>  ___________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>  Hovanes Egiyan wrote:
>>>  Dear members of the committee,
>>>
>>>  Thank you very much for your valuable comments and suggestions.
>>>  We implemented all your comments for the draft of the Phi-- paper.
>>>  I posted the PDF files for our reponse to the latest round of comments
>>>  and
>>>  the new draft of the paper on the review wiki page:
>>>
>>>  http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/eg3/wiki/index.php/Ad_Hoc_Review_of_Phi--_paper_by_the_CLAS_Collaboration#Forth_Round
>>>
>>>
>>>  You can also get the files using the following links:
>>>
>>>  http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/eg3/wiki/index.php/Image:AdHocResponse_3.pdf
>>>
>>>  http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/eg3/wiki/index.php/Image:Penta_draft_06_03_11.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>>  Regards,
>>>          Hovanes.
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas_cascades mailing list
> Clas_cascades at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_cascades