[Clas_hadron] dnp presentation

[Volker Crede]

Dear Chandra,

the results look interesting, indeed. The Sigma^0 and Sigma^+ results differ, but appear to be very similar in shape; the difference for the polarization seems to be about one independent of angle and energy.

In addition to the previous comments:

* I also do not understand the argument for the QGP, at least not in the sense we usually discuss QGP. Perhaps you should take it out.

* You need to be more consistent with the symbol for the proton (should be lower case p) and for the polarization (should be upper case P). It is confusing on some slides where you use P for both.

Good luck

        Volker


On Oct 26, 2011, at 10:35 AM, cnepali at jlab.org wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> I will be giving a talk at DNP meeting on Oct 28th. The talk is
> http://wwwold.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/hadron/presentations/2011/dnp2011_chandra.pdf
> . Sorry it is late. Please send me your comment and suggestion.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chandra
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Clas_hadron mailing list
> Clas_hadron at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_hadron