[Clas_hadron] DNP presentation for Mini-Symposium

[burkert]

Hi Natalie,

A couple comments on your slides.

slide 2: Instead of referring to g8 and g9 in the outline, give the 
observables measured.

slide 3: The bump in the KLambda cross section is now understood as 
being due to P13(1900),
or now referred as N(1900)3/2^+ in PDG2012. The published K-Lambda cross 
section and
polarization data used in the BoGa analysis and others showed clearly 
this state as dominant.
It let to an upgrade of the state from the ** to *** rating. There is no 
D13(1960) state in PDG2012.

slide 4: I suggest to include the formulas that are actually used to 
extract the varies polarization observables,
Sigma, T, G, Ox, Oy. The general formulas on slide 4 are not easy to 
interpret in this regard by non-experts.

slide 7 and slide 8: you might combine into one slide and limit the text 
and time on discussion.
You could give some numbers to characterize the tagger energy resolution 
(~0.1%), energy range
20% - 95% of electron energy).  People know how a photon tagger works,


All the best,
Volker



On 10/17/13 7:19 PM, natalie at jlab.org wrote:
> Hi,
> I have linked my presentation for next week's mini-symposium at the DNP
> meeting on Thursday. I was asked to give an overview talk of kaon
> photoproduction at CLAS. Please let me know if you have any comments or
> suggestions.
>
> http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/g9/natalie/dnp_minisym_kaonphoto_walford.pdf
>
> Thanks,
> Natalie
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas_hadron mailing list
> Clas_hadron at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_hadron