[Clas_hadron] APS abstract

[Eugene Pasyuk]

Hi Zulkaida, 

I have several comments to your abstract. 

1. You are going to show results which were not approved yet. Therefore you should say preliminary. 
2. When you talk about cross section you say that you used circularly polarized photons from longitudinally polarized electron. 
Since beam polarization is irrelevant for cross section I suggest you don't mention beam polarization for this case but keep it for E asymmetry. 
3. when you talk about photon beam say that it was tagged photon beam. 
3. Since the data are not approved I would not draw conclusions about scaling and drop the last statement. 

-Eugene 

> From: "Zulkaida Akbar" <za13 at my.fsu.edu>
> To: "CLAS Hadron Spectroscopy" <clas_hadron at jlab.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 1:03:35 PM
> Subject: [Clas_hadron] APS abstract

> Dear All,

> I plan to submit an abstract for APS meeting. Here is the link to my abstract
> draft :

> http://hadron.physics.fsu.edu/~akbar/ZulkaidaAkbar_APS_abstract.pdf

> I would really appreciate for the suggestions and comments. Thanks in advance.

> Best Regard,

> Zulkaida Akbar

> _______________________________________________
> Clas_hadron mailing list
> Clas_hadron at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_hadron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas_hadron/attachments/20160929/c7908891/attachment.html>