[Clas_hadron] [EXTERNAL] IoP Talk on J/psi photoproduction
Susan Schadmand
s.schadmand at gmail.com
Mon Apr 5 08:53:08 EDT 2021
Hi Richard,
that's a very nice talk!
I have comments and some questions, see below.
Best regads,
Su.
General comments:
* I feel that it is not so practical to have the references on the last
page. In a talk, the audience needs to see a reference on the same and
every page that mentions it. (Also better for extracting a page
post-presentation).
* To my taste, there is too much prose on your slides, especially since
I expect you will go through the slides rather fast.
* I would prefer that the motivational pages (5,6) come first and then
the experimental approach, after that analysis, ...
In detail:
* On page 3, Maybe indicate that the beam comes from the right (which is
unconventional 'on paper'). On page 8 it is 'the right way around'.
Actually, I would rotate CEBAF and CLAS on page 3 so that you have a
similar perspective as on page 2.
* CHL-2 is indicated but you do not mention it.
* As you are referring to GlueX later, I would reduce the labeling of
the halls:
halls A, B, C --> Hall B: CLAS12
hall D --> Hall D: GLueX
* page 6:
I thought you will change collaborations during your talk ;) Here, I
feel CLAS12 belongs in the headline!
𝑃𝐶+resonances at the LHCb (2019) --> 𝑃𝐶+resonances with CLAS12
CLAS12 should be able to place upper limits on the branching
fraction B(𝑃𝐶+→ ψ p) from CLAS12 data.
* On page 9:
Muons are required to have mip like energy deposition... --> Muon
candidates are minimum inonizing, with a significant charged pion
contamination.
* page 11:
𝑒+𝑒−produced on a bound proton in the deuteron target.
question: why muons from p and e+e- from bound p?
Electron radiation in the detector
question: what exactly does that include? means you have not done
simulatons/kfit yet?
viz, you should say that that will be fixed.
what about radiative corrections?
peak to away --> peak away
only a subset of all available data
comment: always say how many percent
* page 12:
photoproduction cross sections are predicted to provide unique
insight --> photoproduction cross sections provide unique insight
Several CLAS12 analyses aiming for these measurements are ongoing
and well
advanced, as they have well defined event and particle identification
techniques.
Several CLAS12 analyses aiming for these measurements are ongoing and well
advanced, as they have well defined event and particle identification
techniques. -->
Several CLAS12 analyses are ongoing for 𝑒𝑝→→(𝑒′)𝑒+𝑒−p
* Joseph Newton, J/ 𝜓 photoproduction
* Pierre Chatagnon, Timelike Compton Scattering
Next, we aim to calculate the total and differential cross sections for
the proton and
deuterium targets. -->
Next: total and differential cross sections for the proton and deuterium
targets
This is a collaborative effort, involving the whole of the CLAS12
collaboration, and in
particular Joseph Newton’s work on J/ 𝜓 photoproduction in the
𝑒𝑝→→(𝑒′)𝑒+𝑒−p channel and Pierre Chatagnon’s work on Timelike
Compton Scattering in the same channel.
On 02.04.21 15:10, Richard Tyson (PGR) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to give a talk on "J/ψ near threshold photoproduction at
> CLAS12" at the upcoming IoP conference
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__appheppnp2021.iopconfs.org_home&d=DwMFCQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=33hEheRcHuqzMP4K5hhMDPge6hQHiwXozGe7lR_eSfg&m=u6I1gvh0kbXC2s4z5iJqCqc4tXtP-9hKbdx0pyjgzJU&s=pkA04KqWSSaEtPyLQiJuoce2mwYOYwhfwj95OuWg-Tk&e=>
> (12th-15th of April). I've already ran this by the dilepton work group
> but wanted to check that this also fine with you all. I've attached my
> slides; any feedback is welcome!
>
> Thanks, Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas_hadron mailing list
> Clas_hadron at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_hadron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas_hadron/attachments/20210405/13d1ff38/attachment.html>
More information about the Clas_hadron
mailing list