<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Hi Charles,<br>
<br>
Thank you for sending me the slides. I went through them rather
quickly, and I agree with you that you probably get through the 59
slides in some 20 minutes(you have 17min) . From the 59 slides 25
(26 to 51) should be run as a short (<20sec) movie. I suggest you
explain only the first slide and automatically in power point skip
to the following slides after displaying each for 0.5 sec (or even
0.3sec). This will give a good impression to the audience about the
kinematic reach and the statistical accuracy of this great set of
polarization data. <br>
<br>
Some of your overlays are not needed to be shown as overlay. For
example the 3 slides 4-6 could be simply shown as 2 separate slides
as you show slide 4 again as slide 6. Similarly, slides 9, 10 could
be shown as a single slide if you incorporate the info on the blue
insert in somewhat reduced fonts on slide. There is some info in the
blue box that is not needed. Just give the info related to your
data (e.g. the 38.34 M 2-pion events). <br>
<br>
The 5 slides 11-15 may be combined to 2 or 3 slide. The yellow box
is not needed as this should be part of your motivation. <br>
<br>
Slide 17 you could skip, as these are details interesting for the
CLAS working group but not for a conference talk. <br>
<br>
Slide 21 has plots that will only confuse people unless you explain
a lot so people understand what looks like very rugged data points
without acceptance corrections. <br>
<br>
slide 22 This is probably an overlay to the previous set of plots
on slide 21. The graphs are not self explanatory. I presume you
have a good reason why you show them this way. If not, drop it. <br>
<br>
slide 24 and 25 look identical to me. <br>
<br>
Slide 26-51 is your short movie - good!<br>
<br>
slide 52-55 I am not sure what people will take away from the mass
dependence of I^c. for different phi bins. They need some
explanations. Perhaps there is something in W. Roberts paper that
you could use and add to slide 52 and 54 as motivation.<br>
<br>
All the best,<br>
Volker<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 5/13/11 8:55 AM, Charles Hanretty wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:BANLkTin-dWQagq3vSNT5YXPTvqPYW5C2PA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Hello all,<br>
I should have explained in my earlier email that many of my
slides build on each other so, for example, what is technically 4
slides really amounts to one slide. Furthermore, the preliminary
results I show (with the exception of 2 slides) will appear as an
animation showing the observable measurements for the E_{gamma}
bins ranging from 1.1 to 1.7 GeV. This is why there are so many
slides in my talk. Still, comments are welcome and I will make
sure to not have a long-winded or rapid-fire talk.<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
Cheers,<br>
Charles Hanretty<br>
<br>
<pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Clas_hadron mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Clas_hadron@jlab.org">Clas_hadron@jlab.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_hadron">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_hadron</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>