Was I missing something? I see only 23 slides. Many of the 59 you may see in a PDF viewer are a type of animation.<br><br>As far as notes though, looks good to me except for these rather minor things:<br><br>slide 4: could be clearer. many points you make are related and the first two could be combined. something like "past experiments have primarily studied these states via single meson FS reactions." Also, you imply (by the indentations) that the widths are a result of the the topology of the channels studied. Also, it is unclear how you connect these "missing resonances" to polarization observables. Maybe a slide rearrangement would solve this (see next note).<br>
<br>slides 11-15: I would put these slides BEFORE you talk about the CLAS detector (after slide 6). I believe its best to present the physics first, say what you want to measure, and then talk about how you measure it.<br>
<br>slide 17 and 18: these two probably unnecessary in this talk -- I would put them at the end as an appendix. It can be mentioned that these corrections were done, but they have nothing to do with the physics involved.<br>
<br>slides 21 and 22: very difficult to read the plots on the bottom. If you could colorize (colz) the phi vs theta scatter plot and lighten it up so that the black points overlay, it might be better, but its still hard to see any pattern in the points I think. Maybe you could connect the points with a line to guide the eye?<br>
<br>slide 23: the para-perp/para+perp equation might be better placed back with slide 15 because the transition to slide 16 seems abrupt.<br><br>slide 25: the highlighting effect is lost here (blue is too dark and looks like black).<br>
<br>slide 26 and 27: these slide are exactly the same.<br>
slide 39 and 40: these slide are exactly the same.<br><br>slides 56-57: the y axis on the plot needs to be zoomed in -- probably from -0.8 to 0.8 or better yet -0.8 to 0.4<br><br>slide 58: I would remove the line: "The issue of missing resonances is ...". Also it is unclear what you mean by "first for a...". And finally, the phrase "aid in the revelation of the internal dynamics of the baryon" seems entirely too broad for the audience you are speaking to, but I am not sure I would remove it, maybe just make it a bit more specific.<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Barry Ritchie <<a href="mailto:Barry.Ritchie@asu.edu">Barry.Ritchie@asu.edu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Charles, while this is a very nicely presented set of slides, a talk should not resemble an Olympic event where one tries to see how many slides can be shown in 17 minutes. Such talks will be given but they are unprofessional and ineffective.<br>
<br>
This is an opportunity for you (and others in the FROST group) to present what we in the FROST group have come up with in a manner that makes people confident of our work as a collaboration. Rapid-fire slide presentations do not inspire confidence or communicate results clearly. As I mentioned earlier, an effective presentation generally averages one slide per minute over the entire presentation, recognizing that some may be shown for more time and others for less time. The 67-slide original would not have been appropriate for a one hour talk, let alone a quarter of that time. And a slide shown for less than one second shouldn't be shown at all.<br>
<br>
Why not sit down with someone, look at what you have and start with the five slides you think are most important and then build the rest of the talk around those with no more than 15 additional slides. Going the other way (dozens down to twenty) will take too long to iterate for a talk you want to give next week. If there is no one to help you with it before you go to the meeting, Eugene would likely be willing to help you with that once you're at the meeting.<br>
<br>
---BGR<br>
<br>
Professor Barry G. Ritchie<br>
Department of Physics<br>
Arizona State University<br>
Tempe, AZ 85287-1504<br>
<br>
Telephone: <a href="tel:%28480%29%20965-4707">(480) 965-4707</a><br>
<br>
<br>
________________________________<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:clas_hadron-bounces@jlab.org">clas_hadron-bounces@jlab.org</a> on behalf of Charles Hanretty<br>
Sent: Thu 5/12/2011 2:12 PM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:clas_hadron@jlab.org">clas_hadron@jlab.org</a><br>
Subject: [Clas_hadron] NSTAR Talk for Hanretty<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
Hello all,<br>
I have placed the slides I plan to present at the upcoming NSTAR conference hosted at JLab in /site/www/html/Hall-B/secure/clas_hadron/presentations/2011/. The file is named "NSTAR_Hanretty.pdf". The talk will be a summary of my extractions of the polarization observables Is and Ic for gamma p->p pi+ pi- from the g8b data set as well as a presentation of my preliminary results. I realize that there are many slides in this talk. Please keep in mind that many of these slides will only be shown for a short period (especially the preliminary results). I will make sure that my talk does not go too long.<br>
<br>
<br>
Comments and/or suggestions are welcome.<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Cheers,<br>
Charles Hanretty<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Clas_hadron mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Clas_hadron@jlab.org">Clas_hadron@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_hadron">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_hadron</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Johann T. Goetz, PhD.<br><a href="mailto:jgoetz@ucla.edu">jgoetz@ucla.edu</a><br>Nefkens Group, UCLA Dept. of Physics & Astronomy<br>Hall-B, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA<br>
Office: 757-269-5465 (CEBAF Center F-335)<br>Mobile: 757-768-9999<br><br>