<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi Sung,<br>
<br>
Perhaps you could make the abstract a bit stronger by not only
saying that the results are in good agreement with previous CLAS
results, but what they add beyond that, e.g. more kinematics
coverage, higher precision, etc.<br>
<br>
Another question I have is, why do you analyze a double polarization
experiments (polarized beam and polarized target) if you only look
at the beam asymmetry? I would expect that the polarized target adds
so much background from the carbon in the polarized target, that the
error bars may not be competitive with the unpolarized target
analysis that we published from Stephen Strauch's data. Perhaps you
could add a few details on the analysis itself. <br>
<br>
Volker<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 1/5/12 3:06 PM, Park, Sungkyun wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:B90BCEBB67532F4ABB52FF21F2A829F51004A60D@SN2PRD0502MB109.namprd05.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Everyone
I have a plan to submit an abstract for the April APS meeting (2012).
It is attached with this email and located at the following in JLab
/site/www/html/Hall-B/secure/clas_hadron/abstracts/2012/APS-April12-skpark.pdf
If you have any comments about my abstract, let me know them.
Best Wishes
Sung
Florida State University</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">This body part will be downloaded on demand.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>