[Clas_offline] Fwd: Priority running for QWeak

[Francois-Xavier Girod]

Nikolai 

You are not supposed to use priority queue for intensive production. Priority is for debug/test.

FX
----- Original Message -----
From: Nikolai Pivnyuk <pivnyuk at jlab.org>
To: Harut Avakian <avakian at jlab.org>
Cc: clas offline <clas_offline at jlab.org>
Sent: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:41:23 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [Clas_offline] Fwd: Priority running for QWeak

Hi Harut,
I have plans for intensive farm usage in near term future. But.

But if people need ONLY 5 DAYS, and if "priority" tasks
(walltime < 30 minutes) will NOT be affected - I do not object, let it be.

Regards,
Nikolai


> Dear All,
> Please let me know if you have any plans for intensive farm usage in
> near term future.
> Regards,
> harut
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Priority running for QWeak
> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:40:35 -0400
> From: Heyes Graham <heyes at jlab.org>
> To: Hansen Ole <ole at jlab.org>, Sawatzky Brad <brads at jlab.org>,
> Ito Mark <marki at jlab.org>, avakian at jlab.org
>
> I have had a request from a Qweak group via Brad for some intensive Farm
> usage. They would require approximately 50% of the farm for five days at
> a time with a lull between, maybe six to ten such periods. The group
> that would be most impacted by this is CLAS who are currently using 80%.
> Can you please give me some feedback on the relative priority of the
> work being done on the farm so that I can judge the merit of giving
> Qweak the time or bump the problem upstairs to Rolf.
>
> Regards,
> 	Graham
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas_offline mailing list
> Clas_offline at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_offline
>


_______________________________________________
Clas_offline mailing list
Clas_offline at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_offline