[Clascomment] OPT-IN: Differential cross sections and spin density matrix elements for the reaction gamma p --> p omega
Marco Ripani
Marco.Ripani at ge.infn.it
Fri Jul 31 07:03:36 EDT 2009
Hi Mike,
thanks now I think I got it. And indeed I had overlooked that in the
second term the uncertainties were first summed, then squared.
Cheers
Marco
Mike Williams wrote:
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> To fully understand the bkgd method, one would have to read the JINST
> paper (which is in the "minor revision" stage now and should be
> published by the end of the summer...hopefully). In Eq.(7), the 1st
> term (summing Q_i^2) is the statistical error and the second term (sum
> sigma_Q_i)^2 is the Q-factor uncertainties assuming 100% correlation
> (since they're added up, then squared...that's 100% correlated).
>
> To understand the stat error, consider a simple example where all of
> the Q's are the same. In that case, sum Q^2 = Q^2 N (where N is the
> number of events). Thus, sigma = Q sqrt(N). If Q=1 (all signal), the
> you'd get a stat error of sqrt(N) as expected. For Q!=1, you need to
> remember that the stat error is on the total event sample (not the
> number of signal). Thus, e.g. Q=1/2, the stat error is 0.5 sqrt(N) for
> this simple example.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Marco Ripani wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I don\'t understand formula (7) in the paper. Why do you add Q_i^2 to
>> the yield uncertainty and in what sense does it represent 100 %
>> correlation ? Sorry, I must be missing something here.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Marco
>>
--
Marco Ripani
Senior Scientist, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare - Genova
Address:
INFN
Via Dodecaneso 33
16146 GENOVA - ITALY
tel./fax 39-010-3536458
cell. 39-328-2191138
Jlab office room F244
tel. 1-757-269-7266 fax 1-757-269-6273
E-Mail: ripani at ge.infn.it
More information about the Clascomment
mailing list