[Clascomment] updated responses

[Stepan Stepanyan]

Mike,

Thanks for the update.
I read the new version of the draft. I have one more comment.
This related to Fig. 2. First I do not know why you need this figure.
Secondly, reading the text I am afraid you are not showing figure
you wanted, or the text is wring. On page 3, left column, last paragraph
you present transparency ratios as T_A/T_2H and are referring to
Fig. 2, while in Fig. 2 you are showing T_A/T_12C. What exactly
you want to show and say?
In general, why you need deuterium data at all, you are not using them,
do not you.

Stepan

Wood, Michael H wrote:
> Hi Stepan,
>
> I have updated my responses to your comments after we talked last week.  Thanks for your help.
>
> Mike
>