[Clascomment] OPT-IN: Branching Ratio of the Electromagnetic Decay of the Sigma+(1385)

[Enzo DeSanctis]

The paper is very well written. Congratulations.
I have only the following minor suggestions (my locator is page/column/paragraph/line):

2/r/1/2: I would change “CEBAF large Acceptance Spectrometer (CLAS) in Hall B …” in "CLAS in Hall B …”, as the meaning of CLAS has been written two paragraphs earlier on the same page. 

3/r/5/8: I would change “In g11a the information about …” in “In g11a run period the information about …”

6/r/5/7-9: I would drop the sentence “The g11a target was 40 cm long, … from the CLAS center.” as the information has been already given on page 2/r/1/8-10.

10/Fig.): why data are shown as the histogram and MC as the points, and not viceversa as it is usually done?

18/Ref. 24: give the updated print: J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010)