[Clascomment] OPT-IN: Resolving the proton form factor problem by comparing electron and positron scattering from the proton

[Larry Weinstein]

Dear Stepan,

Thank you for your comments.
  1) I removed the reference to the cerenkov counters because we did not 
use them
  2) The text says that

    The final data set was grouped into four magnet cycles and each
    magnet cycle contained all possible configurations
    (c+t+,c+t−,c−t+,c−t− where c and t are the chi- cane and torus
    magnet polarities, respectively).

so when we removed the negative chicane data of cycle two, this refers 
to the c-t+ and c-t- parts of that cycle.
  3) Because they're not officially published yet.  We're fasttracking 
this paper in hopes that we can submit to PRL before Novosibirsk.

Stepan Stepanyan wrote:
> Dear Larry et al.,
>
> Here are few comments:
>
> page 2, line 34 - only calorimeter is mentioned as a forward detector. May be
> it is worthwhile to mention that  CC is also <45^o?
> page 3, line 44 -  it may be better to say explicitly which cycle was discarded
> instead of "cycle two". On page 2 it describes four cycles as c+t+, c+t-, c-t+,
> and c-t-. From there I would assume "cycle two" is c+t-. But then what it means
> "The negative chicane data for magnet cycle two"?
> page 4, points on Fig. 3 - why Novosibirsk results are not shown?
>   
> Stepan

-- 
				Sincerely,
				Larry

-----------------------------------------------------------
Lawrence Weinstein
University Professor
Physics Department
Old Dominion University
Norfolk, VA 23529
757 683 5803
757 683 3038 (fax)
weinstein at odu.edu
http://www.lions.odu.edu/~lweinste/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clascomment/attachments/20141119/e083e8b4/attachment.html