[Clascomment] OPT-IN:Longitudinal target-spin asymmetries for deeply virtual Compton scattering
Kijun Park
parkkj at jlab.org
Tue Sep 30 22:43:56 EDT 2014
Dear Authors,
This is a very nice result and report.
I just have a couple of minor comments.
Abstract:
(1) Fourth line;
If authors used $\vec{e}\vec{p} \to e^{prime} p^{prime} \gamma$,
it may confuse readers with double-spin asymmetry.
(2) $t$ and $-t$ are used in many places.
Sign is not important ?
(3) I don't see any discussion about radiative corrections, even though
it is cancelled out in asymmetry (I am not sure...).
(4) line:54, ($x-\xi$)
(4) line:269, this -> these
(5) line:240, 295, 266, 297, 322, : remove "-" or at lease consistently used with others.
(6) line:334-336, I don't understand this statement.
I think authors want to say that the statistical uncertainty is dominated.
More information about the Clascomment
mailing list