OPT-IN:Target and Double Spin Asymmetries of Deeply Virtual Ï0 Production with a Longitudinally Polarized Proton Target and CLAS

[Stepan Stepanyan]

page 3 - line 223, systematic uncertainty on the beam polarization coming form the Hall-B Moller polarimeter is 3% - 4%, often called as 3.5%. How can systematics from beam and target polarization and the dilution factor be only 3%
page 3, line 250, it should be "constrain" not "contrain"
page 4, line 278, it should be "GGL" not "GL", everywhere else is GGL
page 4, lines 296-297, better to say "... which contains contributions only from chiral-odd GPDs".