OPT-IN: Target and Beam-Target Spin Asymmetries in exclusive Ï+ and Ïâ electroproduction with 1.6 to 5.7 GeV electrons

[Stepan Stepanyan]

line 21 - paragraph, should reference appear at the end of the citation, [11] should go after
"W>2 GeV", before period, and [12] at the end of sentence, after "lab".
line 75 - 2% for momentum resolution is too high, according to CLAS NIM paper it is ~1%
line 77 - the azimuthal angle resolution is 4 mrad, not 3
line 89 - the max current for torus is 3840A
line 101 - too many "the" before "subject"
line 107 & 108 - these two sentences has nothing to do with data processing, what is the meaning?
line 133 - "67&" must be corrected, this probably should be 0.27 or 27%
line 138 - this sentence should be rewritten, it is not clear what it means "time-of-arrival at the SC
bank"
line 144 - why this requirement of 0.3 GeV for neutrons? did you really cut this high in energy?
line 156 - kinematic cuts and dilution factor
line 190 - states that electron-proton missing mass should be equal to the pion mass, by the way sentence missing "be" and "to" I think. Then missing mass squared distributions are shown, Fig.3, and cuts are defined
on missing mass squared as 0.11 to 0.15 GeV^2. The mass squared of the pion is 0.02 GeV^2, needs explanations why the cut range is so out of range.
line 259 - parenthesis is missing at the end of the line    
line 293 - have you tested how much the final results will change if instead of 32 parameter fit have only
few parameters only, just a smooth fit without resonance structure. Is it clear why fit to fully exclusive final
state does not show resonance structure (red curves)
line 367 - there should be some thing (noun) after "elastic" either "scattering" or "events" or "scattering events"
page 25 - no reference to Table VIII in the text
Table VIII - how "Total" in the table was calculated, some of them are squared sum of three independent
errors, but some are not. For example for pi- (lower table), 2.5 GeV A_{LL}, sqrt(0.07^2+0.12^2+0.02^2)=0.14,
not 0.12 as in the table and there are many like that
line 390 - "From 6" means Eq.(6), so it should be "From Eq.(6)"
line 393 - missing period at the end
line 413 - should it be "electron-proton missing mass" ? instead of "electron-pion"
line 427 - just want to make sure that the text files will be attached to this paper
line 429 - the first 3 sentence, at least, of this paragraph should be under "Results", section V, not under V.A
line 434 - is this binning strategy only for e\pi^+n? what is the binning for \pi^-? 
line 443 - should be Q^2
line 446 - "fits ARE not bad ..." and "but are considerably ..."