[Clascomment] OPT-IN: Measurement of charged pion production in deep-inelastic scattering off nuclei with the CLAS detector23
Volker Burkert
burkert at jlab.org
Wed Aug 11 18:39:21 EDT 2021
Dear lead authors,
It is good to see that these data are now ready for publication. Congratulations!
I like very much the detailed discussion of all systematic effects.
I don't have comments to the content, but just want to comments on the data presentation.
1) This is a full paper and all the data points shown in the figures should be made available in the
form of tables, with the exact values and uncertainties. There is no limit
The data points are very close together in the figures are hardly readable.
2) Once the data are tabulated, the figures should be used only to display the main features of their
kinematic dependencies.
For example in Figure 2, I suggest to only include one Q^2 point, as the
dependencies on "z" are very similar, and anyone interested in the Q2 dependence can pick the
values of the tables (which is impossible to do from the graphs, anyway).
The same holds for Figure 3, only use one Q^2 value.
In figure 4 and in figure 5, I suggest to do the same, and include only one of the nuclei.
3) Since the figures are all in color, which will not in the printed version, you need to put after the
Figure X.(color online) before the caption. Also, make sure that the various data markers and shadings
are clearly identifiable what they represent when printed in black & white.
4) Figure 1. Don't put the legend next to the figure. There is plenty of space inside the figure frame
to put the legend above/below the data points and curves. You may also consider showing each of the graphs
separately in larger size at different aspect ratio, and with larger markers to make it more impressive.
5) Minor comments:
- line 37: "through nuclei" => "through the nucleus" (you talk about interaction of "an electron".
It will not go through several nuclei)
- line 238: "using the proton elastic reaction" => "using the elastic electron proton scattering process"
- line 707 - 712. There are 3 times phrases such as "the data could help/put.......". That is a very weak
results. Can the statements be made stronger and definitive. For example "The data will ..." .
All the best,
Volker
More information about the Clascomment
mailing list