[Clascomment] OPT-IN: First CLAS12 measurement of DVCS beam-spin asymmetries in the extended valence region

[Stepan Stepanyan]

- line 100, “well-reconstructed proton”, can we avoid such statements? What does that mean, what do we want to emphasize that there are not well-reconstructed protons? Why?
- line 105, why $\theta_{\gamma\gamma}$ when on the plot in Fig.2 (right) it is $\theta_{cone}$? And should be “Fig.2, right”.
- line 120, should be “Fig.2 left”. 
- line 153, should we introduce plots on the figure from left to right: “the missing squared mass and the cone angle.”
- line 182, in the formula, is the mass of N. Can you write M and define it as the mass of the nucleon N.
- line 182 and 188, no definition or explanation of variable t and t_{min}
- line 213, “the kinematics at the vertex” is an incorrect statement. The incoming electron can/will radiate before the interaction (vertex).
- line 250 down, can we have a reference for the definition of weights 
- line 257, what is the definition of “T”  and the sum range for the second sum