<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<pre>Hi Dave,
Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Bellow we listed our response and
actions we took following your suggestions.
* We believe that this definition of inefficiency is pretty common in the community.
* We added "United Kingdom's Science and Technology Facilities Council" to the Acknowledgements subsection.
* The subscript "t" in μ<sub><i>t</i></sub> in Eq. (4) indicates that this is a variable of which
the left-hand-side is a function. The μ in the denominator is different, it does not show
up in the left-hand-side as an argument because the supremum in the denominator is taken over all three
variables (<i>e</i>,<i>b</i>,μ). That is, we go over all values of these three variable looking for the
value of the <i>P</i> which is the maximal. In the numerator we look for the supremum of <i>P</i>
only over two variables (<i>e</i>,<i>b</i>), and it is dependent on at what μ<sub><i>t</i></sub> we are looking
for the maximal <i>P</i>.
Regards,
Hovanes.
</pre>
<br>
On 07/30/2011 01:11 PM, David Ireland wrote:
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:201107301711.p6UHBX2u008603@clasweb.jlab.org">
<pre wrap="">Hi Hovannes et al.,
This is a nice paper. I picked up just a few points:
* p6, left col, para 2: You refer to "inefficiency", which I assume is "1 - efficiency". I'm not sure how clear this concept is to the reader.
* acknowledgements: Please add "United Kingdom's Science and Technology Facilities Council"
* p8, right col, three lines after eq. (4): there is a subscript "t" on \mu in the in-text equation, which is not in the denominator of eq.(4) - is this a typo, or have I misunderstood?
Cheers,
Dave
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>