<html><body><div><div id="yiv755347177"><div><div><div id="yiv755347177yui_3_7_2_18_1357005273670_75">Hi, Kei, Reinhard,</div><div id="yiv755347177yui_3_7_2_18_1357005273670_79">Congratulations on the paper -- clearly this's a very thorough analysis and lots of hard work went into it. My only slight concern is that at least this paper doesn't show too much of angular analysis and mostly ``assumes'' that L1405 -> Sigma Pi is pure S-wave. Are you going to show later that there is negligible P-wave in follow up papers? Also, when there are a bunch of nearby S-wave contributions, as you claim is the case here, it's usually conventional to use the K-matrix formalism, instead of using
the BW form. It's not too difficult -- just the form of the amplitude changes and Anisovich et al has the standard formulas.<br></div><div id="yiv755347177yui_3_7_2_18_1357005273670_167">One minor comment regarding Fig. 2 -- since your main impact result is that the charged modes have different lineshapes and thereby BF's, it might be a good idea to change the uniform 1/3 BF to each mode as shown here, or make a comment to draw the reader's attention. Also, in the 4th column, I believe Fig. 5a/5b should be changed to 6a/6b. For Figs. 3 and 4, why not make them into subfigures as well?</div><div id="yiv755347177yui_3_7_2_18_1357005273670_200">Once again, very nice work and good luck ahead at Phys. Rev..</div><div id="yiv755347177yui_3_7_2_18_1357005273670_208">Cheers,</div><div id="yiv755347177yui_3_7_2_18_1357005273670_212">-Biplab<br></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>