<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>Biplab,<br><br>It is not for the referee to tell you what should and what should not be in the paper. You are the author. If you choose to ignore the other collaboration paper on the subject you should give the collaboration explanations for doing so. This will look very strange for external world as if within the CLAS collaboration the right hand does not know what the left hand does.<br><br><div><span name="x"></span>-Eugene<span name="x"></span><br></div><br><hr id="zwchr"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Biplab Dey" <biplabdey@yahoo.com><br><b>To: </b>clascomment@jlab.org<br><b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:09:25 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Clascomment] OPT-IN: Data analysis techniques, differential cross sections and spin density matrix elements for the reaction gamma p -> phi p<br><br><div><div>Dear All,</div><div>Just a gentle reminder that our replies and latest draft have been posted here:<br></div><div>http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~biplabd/jlab/</div><div class="yahoo_quoted"> If you have further questions, please let us know asap. We would like to finalize the submission draft by today.<br>Thank you,<br>-The authors<br><br> <br> <div> <div> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 9:52 AM, Biplab Dey <biplabdey@yahoo.com> wrote:<br> </font> </div> <blockquote> <div class="y_msg_container"><div id="yiv5028974031"><div><div><div>Hi again, Reinhard,</div><div>I've tried to address your
comments as best as I could:</div><div>http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~biplabd/jlab/</div><div>I'm aware of the issue of garbled up plots in the printed
versions. It would need going back and re-saving those plots as .eps (I think). I'm not in a position to do this right now, but I'll take care of this before the final publication. </div><div>-Biplab<br clear="none"></div><div><br clear="none"></div><div><br clear="none"></div><div class="yiv5028974031yqt1437403301" id="yiv5028974031yqt59661"><div class="yiv5028974031yahoo_quoted"> <br clear="none"> <br clear="none"> <div> <div> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 11:03 AM, Reinhard Schumacher <schumacher@cmu.edu> wrote:<br clear="none"> </font> </div> <blockquote> <div class="yiv5028974031y_msg_container">Hello Biplab,<br clear="none"><br clear="none"> I read your comments on my comments. Here is a second iteration on those comments, for the points where I still have a question. <br clear="none"><br clear="none">Title: I still feel that the present title is still over-playing the fact that you did a lot of work on the
analysis methods. Every analysis is a lot of work, and unique in some way. I would remove that first phrase.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">line 115: Its far from clear to me why you would let a referee
dictate the content of 'your' paper. There is no drawback to mentioning the other paper, and several things to gain.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Eq 11: ah, yes. I see.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">line 529: Yes, I see the point, of course. Perhaps you could rephrase the sentence "The dwindling phase space at higher MKK...."<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Fig 7: I downloaded the paper again, and again got scrambled figure legends and labels for this and many other figures. (???)<br clear="none"><br clear="none">line 1020: Just reread your sentence about a slow rise with energy of both B and C. In Fig 31 B is falling and then flattening, and C is rising only if you ignore the most prominent feature of the distribution. I think you have to qualify your statement.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Fig 36: I still stand by my previous comment, though I could be wrong... The GJ frame is
defined in the rest frame of the V, which is what your label indicates. But you show the V as moving and the IP at rest.
You want to illustrate a V being created out of the collision of a gamma and the IP, don't you?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Reinhard<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div></div> </div></div></div><br><br></div> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div> </div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Clascomment mailing list<br>Clascomment@jlab.org<br>https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clascomment</blockquote><br></div></body></html>