<html><body><div><div>Dear All,</div><div>Just a gentle reminder that our replies and latest draft have been posted here:<br></div><div>http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~biplabd/jlab/</div><div class="yahoo_quoted"> If you have further questions, please let us know asap. We would like to finalize the submission draft by today.<br>Thank you,<br>-The authors<br><br> <br> <div> <div> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 9:52 AM, Biplab Dey <biplabdey@yahoo.com> wrote:<br> </font> </div> <blockquote> <div class="y_msg_container"><div id="yiv5028974031"><div><div><div>Hi again, Reinhard,</div><div>I've tried to address your
comments as best as I could:</div><div>http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~biplabd/jlab/</div><div>I'm aware of the issue of garbled up plots in the printed
versions. It would need going back and re-saving those plots as .eps (I think). I'm not in a position to do this right now, but I'll take care of this before the final publication. </div><div>-Biplab<br clear="none"></div><div><br clear="none"></div><div><br clear="none"></div><div class="yiv5028974031yqt1437403301" id="yiv5028974031yqt59661"><div class="yiv5028974031yahoo_quoted"> <br clear="none"> <br clear="none"> <div> <div> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 11:03 AM, Reinhard Schumacher <schumacher@cmu.edu> wrote:<br clear="none"> </font> </div> <blockquote> <div class="yiv5028974031y_msg_container">Hello Biplab,<br clear="none"><br clear="none"> I read your comments on my comments. Here is a second iteration on those comments, for the points where I still have a question. <br clear="none"><br clear="none">Title: I still feel that the present title is still over-playing the fact that you did a lot of work on the
analysis methods. Every analysis is a lot of work, and unique in some way. I would remove that first phrase.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">line 115: Its far from clear to me why you would let a referee
dictate the content of 'your' paper. There is no drawback to mentioning the other paper, and several things to gain.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Eq 11: ah, yes. I see.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">line 529: Yes, I see the point, of course. Perhaps you could rephrase the sentence "The dwindling phase space at higher MKK...."<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Fig 7: I downloaded the paper again, and again got scrambled figure legends and labels for this and many other figures. (???)<br clear="none"><br clear="none">line 1020: Just reread your sentence about a slow rise with energy of both B and C. In Fig 31 B is falling and then flattening, and C is rising only if you ignore the most prominent feature of the distribution. I think you have to qualify your statement.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Fig 36: I still stand by my previous comment, though I could be wrong... The GJ frame is
defined in the rest frame of the V, which is what your label indicates. But you show the V as moving and the IP at rest.
You want to illustrate a V being created out of the collision of a gamma and the IP, don't you?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Reinhard<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div></div> </div></div></div><br><br></div> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div> </div></body></html>