<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Dear Mikhail,<br>
<br>
1) We modified the text to read:<br>
<blockquote>The cross section ratio $R$ was measured for each bin.
It was then divided by a radiative correction factor equal to the
ratio of the $e^+p$ and $e^-p$ radiatively corrected cross
sections calculated in the modified peaking approximation
\cite{ent01} and averaged over each bin by Monte Carlo
integration. <br>
</blockquote>
2) The data points are located at the data-weighted center of each
bin. The bin extent for the Q^2=1.45 data can be seen in figure 2.
For example, the data point for the bin extending in epsilon from
0.2 to 0.5 is located at 0.4.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Mikhail Osipenko wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:201411200757.sAK7vbRo007181@clasweb.jlab.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Dear Authors of TPE paper,
I have a couple of questions:
in page 4 first paragraph - you probably wanted to state that you have made Monte Carlo simulations of two radiative cross sections (for e+ and e-) over entire kinematics of the bin and then took the ratio of these cross sections? As it is written now it looks like you did some kind of strange average of correction factor \delta_brem over the Q2 range from 1 to 4 GeV^2.
In Figs.3 and 4 you don't provide the horizontal bin bars, is the data corrected for bin-centering somehow?
Best Regards,
Mikhail.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Sincerely,
Larry
-----------------------------------------------------------
Lawrence Weinstein
University Professor
Physics Department
Old Dominion University
Norfolk, VA 23529
757 683 5803
757 683 3038 (fax)
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:weinstein@odu.edu">weinstein@odu.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.lions.odu.edu/~lweinste/">http://www.lions.odu.edu/~lweinste/</a></pre>
</body>
</html>