[Color_transp] Hydrogen transparency

[John Matter]

I put my efficiency calculations in a Google sheet that I'll add a link to
on the wiki. I'll keep it up to date in the future

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreadsheets_d_1Rr0gYVanlCStCzRr1kG-2DuTBEdDZxLqEQybLdlug5TNI_edit-23gid-3D0&d=DwIFaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=PlOle99XPvxL6CmvTc4fUh-qC6z3imI38VmlH8KkXzE&m=46fosN60AukbXASk6pglB5FQ8_fJE6uIsCuAaArWjjA&s=xVvSsbHJppptMtwDEm2oIiyvzBktqZwpqcPnz4wNeHs&e= 

- John


On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 5:48 PM Holly Szumila-Vance <hszumila at jlab.org>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I’ve gone through the SIMC and hydrogen data to get the good counts. I
> added a tab to our spreadsheet called “SIMC” with the integral numbers we
> need. I started to try to compute the transparency in the spreadsheet but
> ran into a few issues:
> 1. Q2=9.5,11.5,14.3 still need updated numbers for charge, etc for pass 1
> (I see this was done for Q2=8).
> 2. We are missing the following runs from pass1: 2279, 2280, 2281, 2452,
> 2453, 2464
> 3. John- can you make a table that contains the latest and greatest
> efficiency numbers? I was trying to pick them off your plots, but it’s not
> precise. Maybe we can just put a table on the wiki that you can update (or
> let me know if I missed it).
>
> We should replay those runs and then verify the beam charge in pass1 for
> the other settings.
> -Holly
> _______________________________________________
> Color_transp mailing list
> Color_transp at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/color_transp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/color_transp/attachments/20181213/2860d0dc/attachment.html>