[Color_transp] [EXTERNAL] CT Analysis Meeting (Tomorrow at 4:30 PM, Rm CCL210a)

[John Matter]

Tomorrow at 12:30 EST will work for me as well.
- John

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:10 PM Holly Szumila-Vance <hszumila at jlab.org> wrote:
>
> 12:30EST tomorrow is good for me!
> ________________________________
> From: Dipangkar Dutta <ddutta07 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 3:59 PM
> To: Carlos Ayerbe Gayoso <gayoso at jlab.org>
> Cc: Holly Szumila-Vance <hszumila at jlab.org>; color transp <color_transp at jlab.org>
> Subject: Re: [Color_transp] [EXTERNAL] CT Analysis Meeting (Tomorrow at 4:30 PM, Rm CCL210a)
>
> In place of today's meeting, I am unable to attend today as well
> Cheers
> Dipangkar
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:57 PM Carlos Ayerbe Gayoso <gayoso at jlab.org> wrote:
>
> Besides today's meeting or in place of today?
>
> -Carlos
> ________________________________
> From: Color_transp <color_transp-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Dipangkar Dutta <ddutta07 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 3:51 PM
> To: Holly Szumila-Vance <hszumila at jlab.org>
> Cc: color transp <color_transp at jlab.org>
> Subject: Re: [Color_transp] [EXTERNAL] CT Analysis Meeting (Tomorrow at 4:30 PM, Rm CCL210a)
>
> Yes, let us try to meet tomorrow how about 12:30 PM EST.
> We can use the usual CT bluejeans link
> Cheers
> Dipangkar
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:55 PM Holly Szumila-Vance <hszumila at jlab.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I won’t be able to call in today as planned as I had a family emergency to take care of.
>
> I wanted to discuss the current CT status. I haven’t updated the spreadsheet yet with the latest and greatest normfac values (these are very small changes due to the modifications to the materials made in SIMC), but I will update this shortly.
>
> I am going to post everything into a new “final” version type of spreadsheet and post that. What I need to know is what is the best/latest efficiency values and factors we need to use? If you look through the Pass 2 spreadsheet, I do a comparison using the quick efficiencies DD calculated and the thorough efficiencies John calculated, and there is always about a 10% lower transparency with the thorough ones. We need to look into this and try to understand why.
>
> With the target boiling corrections input, we have improved hydrogen values for the Q2=8, but it is still low (~0.96). Also the Q2=14 hydrogen is at about the same value so I am not sure if there is another factor that I haven’t considered (you can see the calculation in the Pass2 spreadsheet).
>
> If anyone is interested to meet to discuss this tomorrow afternoon, I am available. We could use the usual blue jeans. Anytime after 12pm is ok for me, but I can also wait until next week if everyone is busy.
>
> Let me know if you have questions/comments. We should think about the results when we include the proper systematic errors and what those are per setting.
>
> -Holly
>
>
>
> On Nov 6, 2019, at 12:48 PM, Dipangkar Dutta <ddutta07 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> We will have our regular analysis meeting at 4:30 PM EST tomorrow, Thursday.
> For those at JLab room CCL210a has been reserved.
>
> The  link for remote participation is:
> Meeting URL
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bluejeans.com_803842859&d=DwIFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=XtVl8BY42jbbWh0Vu1ygqgFBYEJMENirtKAh3P_9ayw&m=6cTQDJB55YHkvJyFbg8O740Lk609VlmUHHApPH29V3Y&s=YVkAbTfR3RFdaIGbfVyq_LmEmfjpc8dY6ErtomL9Sso&e= 
>
> Please add any slides that you may have to the elog at
> https://hallcweb.jlab.org/elogs/Color+Transparency/
>
>
> Cheers
> Dipangkar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Color_transp mailing list
> Color_transp at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/color_transp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Color_transp mailing list
> Color_transp at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/color_transp