[Cps] [EXTERNAL] Target dose @90na

[Day, Donal B (dbd)]

Tanja, Rolf, Bogdan et al.

Thank you for listening to  my concerns this morning.

My concerns will be assuaged if a we had a radiation dose prediction of the target after a month of running with an electron beam of 90 na. No CPS and a pure electron beam.

I’d like to compare the case presented by Pavel today with one where the beam energy and target details are unchanged but instead of a photon beam on the target, 
the study would assume an electron beam of 90 na.

In other words, I’d like to compare what MIGHT be real-world conditions (with the CPS) with what would represent the conditions we have actually had in the past.

I might have asked for something that leaves us open to criticism that we are comparing apples to oranges. 

Thanks in advance,

Donal



Donal Day
University of Virginia
Department of Physics
dbd at virginia.edu
434 924 6566




> On Apr 20, 2023, at 8:07 PM, Tanja Horn via Cps <cps at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> A reminder of our meeting tomorrow, Friday 21 April at 9AM ET. The zoom connection is:
> 
> Join ZoomGov Meeting
> https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1606683849?pwd=dmpRN3VpSVBzajdVTk1qd1AvWjlNQT09
> 
> Meeting ID: 160 668 3849
> Passcode: 550135
> 3849
> Passcode: 550135
> 
> Best wishes,
> Tanja
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 4:25 PM Tanja Horn <hornt at jlab.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> We will have our next CPS meeting next week on Friday 21 April at 9AM ET.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Tanja
> _______________________________________________
> Cps mailing list
> Cps at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/cps

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3348 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/cps/attachments/20230421/937a4421/attachment.p7s>