[d2n-analysis-talk] missing tracks (fwd)

[Brad Sawatzky]

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Diana Parno wrote:

> branch. We should probably be trying to keep things structured in more or 
> less the same way amongst our various machines.

I started installing software on the new d2n analysis machine this
morning.  It should be available for general use by the end of the week.
Part of the plan is to resync our analyzer with the transversity branch
and merge the DB updates to the CVS.  That should help.

> Matt also sent me an email from Xin (see second forwarded email; this was 
> just before this list was set up) pointing us to the updated optics files 
> in his directories. When I imported the db_BB.optics.dat and 
> db_BB.mwdc.dat files from those directories and reran my replay, I got 
> 28,000 tracks, which is a lot better than the 200 tracks I was getting 
> earlier -- but it's still nowhere near the 140,000+ tracks that Xin was 
> previously getting from the same run. I'm going to try pulling the new BB 
> library from Transversity's CVS, too; I don't know when the d2n CVS 
> version dates from.

For the immediate term -- make sure that you and Matt are using the same
DB files (Matt can tar up his $DB_DIR directory and email it to you.)

-- Brad

-- 
Brad Sawatzky, PhD <brads at jlab.org>  -<>-  Jefferson Lab / Hall C / C111
  Ph: 757-269-5947 -<>- Pager: 757-584-5947 -<>- Fax: 757-269-7848
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
  discoveries, is not "Eureka!" but "That's funny..."   -- Isaac Asimov