[d2n-analysis-talk] Fwd: Which TDCs for Scintillators?

[David Flay]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vincent Sulkosky <vasulk at jlab.org>
Date: Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: Which TDCs for Scintillators?
To: David Flay <flay at jlab.org>



Hi David,

The TDCs used for S1 and S2m on the left HRS were 1875 TDCs with 50 ps
resolution.  I am not sure why Brad thougth we were using something else.

Cheers,
Vince


On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, David Flay wrote:

 Hey Vince,
>
> I'm wondering -- which TDCs were used in d2n?  My S2m *.dat file claims
> 1875, though Brad doesn't think we used that... I checked my other DB files
> from different directories, and they also say 1875.  However, I've
> implemented changes to my S1 and S2m DB files over time, and copied them
> directly to every other timestamped directory.  Further, my oldest versions
> of my working DB claim that the TDCs are 1875, but I fear that the true
> model # was lost when we first compiled our database for offline analysis
> (which I can't seem to locate; my earliest backup is 9/29/09, shortly after
> Matt and I compiled a 'merged' database of what we had).
>
> Any help is appreciated -- thanks.
>
> Dave
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> David Flay
> Physics Department
> Temple University
> Philadelphia, PA 19122
>
> office: Barton Hall, BA319
> phone: (215) 204-1331
>
> e-mail: flay at jlab.org
>          flay at temple.edu
>
> website: http://www.jlab.org/~flay <http://www.jlab.org/%7Eflay>
>            http://quarks.temple.edu
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
David Flay
Physics Department
Temple University
Philadelphia, PA 19122

office: Barton Hall, BA319
phone: (215) 204-1331

e-mail: flay at jlab.org
           flay at temple.edu

website: http://www.jlab.org/~flay
             http://quarks.temple.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/d2n-analysis-talk/attachments/20100407/00e0abef/attachment-0001.html