[d2n-analysis-talk] [Fwd: Re: BigBite Farm Replay: MWDC variables]
Gregg B. Franklin
gbfranklin at cmu.edu
Sun Dec 5 19:54:08 EST 2010
Seamus reports that 7 to 15% of the GEn events had good tracks and it
depended on kinematics. We didn't have a Cerenkov, but we had Big-Hand
in coincidence. Probably hard to compare the two experiments.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [d2n-analysis-talk] BigBite Farm Replay: MWDC variables
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:19:05 -0500
From: Brad Sawatzky <brads at jlab.org>
To: d2n-analysis-talk at jlab.org
Forward to the list so others can comment.
-- Brad
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010, Diana Parno wrote:
> The ratio of events with tracks to events with no tracks seems to be
> pretty consistent with the runs I've looked at recently -- about
> 15.5%, give or take 0.1%, according to the cut summary. It will be
> very straightforward to plot this as a function of run number, so we
> can definitely keep an eye on its behavior.
Good. that should certainly be part of the 'sanity-check' histograms.
Do you recall if that 15.5% is comparible to what GEn ended up with? I
would think that GEn should have been considerably worse than us because
they did not have a Cherenkov in the trigger. I recall there were a
huge amount of gammas firing the shower counter -- a lot (?) of those
inherently trackless triggers should have been suppressed in the T2
trigger.
-- Brad
--
Brad Sawatzky, PhD <brads at jlab.org> -<>- Jefferson Lab / Hall C / C111
Ph: 757-269-5947 -<>- Fax: 757-269-5235 -<>- Pager: brads-page at jlab.org
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries, is not "Eureka!" but "That's funny..." -- Isaac Asimov
_______________________________________________
d2n-analysis-talk mailing list
d2n-analysis-talk at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/d2n-analysis-talk
--
Prof. Gregg B Franklin
Head, Department of Physics
Carnegie Mellon University
phone: (412) 268-2743 fax: (412) 681-0648
More information about the d2n-analysis-talk
mailing list