[d2n-analysis-talk] APS talk

[Zein-Eddine Meziani]

Hi Matt,

It looks better to me, except for minor things.

At the end  after future work you could finish by showing the  
expectation of the proposal on d2 or g2 of this experiment.
People are still interested to see how your measurement would  
ultimately compare to world data.

  I would put,

Work supported in part by:

DOE......  (Temple)
DOE....or NSF.... (CMU)?

  Ask Diane about their grant number too

Zein-Eddine




On Feb 10, 2010, at 11:28 AM, posik at jlab.org wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>   Here is my most recently revised talk.
>
> http://jlab.org/~posik/aps_2010.pdf
>
> Please let me know your thoughts. In particular on the HRS slide, as
> Zein-Eddine has expressed concern about the p=0.6 GeV kinematic  
> rejection
> factors and electron efficiencies. After talking to Dave and recalling
> our meetings, This "bad" kinematic is due to an impure electron  
> sample,
> because it is over run with lots of pion contamination. Which is an
> artifact of high pion production at the low momentum setting.
>
> I also removed the electron efficiency and all of the five pass pion
> rejection factors and electron efficiencies because I feel like am  
> going
> to be pushing my allotted time.
>
> Thanks
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> d2n-analysis-talk mailing list
> d2n-analysis-talk at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/d2n-analysis-talk