[d2n-analysis-talk] Fwd: LHRS Scintillator Calibration Study
David Flay
flay at jlab.org
Wed Mar 3 15:46:13 EST 2010
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Chiranjib Dutta <chiran at jlab.org> wrote:
> Hi David,
> Sorry I could not get back to you last night. I am just screwed
> up with all different things and I am going to Colorado
> tomorrow.
> I think your offsets look good. Now go to:
>
> /w/work5602/transversity/chiranjib/analysis/replay/DB/20081116 and then
>
> db_L.s1.dat and db_L.s2.dat
>
> I would not trust too much on the s1 database as I did not do any time
> offsets there. But I think I did the timewalk.
>
> S2 should be fine.
>
> Let me know if you happen to run into problems !!
>
I am having a strange problem... if I check the scintillators for different
momenta, it seems all good for elastic run 1229, and 20145 (p = 0.6 GeV,
5-pass -- as opposed to 4-pass that I showed you just now).
However, with seemingly increasing momentum, I get strange behavior
(particularly in S1 time avg) -- see attached plots. Note -- beta also
isn't that consistent as p changes..
This doesn't make sense to me -- I'm using the same DB file for every run,
to my knowledge when I made the updates. I've seen no HV changes in the
HALOG... it would make more sense to me if I saw the time offset change in
S1 as well, but it's still ~ 1 or 2 ns if not 0... There are fluctuations in
the time offsets if you look paddle by paddle -- but that structure in the
time avg for S1 is baffling (see 20263 plots -- p = 1.42 GeV, 5-pass. If I
go higher in p, the effect seems to become more and more pronounced..)
I originally thought this calibration should be momentum independent...
P.S. -- How did your interview go? If you didn't have it yet, good luck!
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
David Flay
Physics Department
Temple University
Philadelphia, PA 19122
office: Barton Hall, BA319
phone: (215) 204-1331
e-mail: flay at jlab.org
flay at temple.edu
website: http://www.jlab.org/~flay
http://quarks.temple.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/d2n-analysis-talk/attachments/20100303/ec35efd4/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: beta-track_1229_3_3_10.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 27971 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/d2n-analysis-talk/attachments/20100303/ec35efd4/attachment-0004.pdf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: scint_toffs_1229_3_3_10.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 69855 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/d2n-analysis-talk/attachments/20100303/ec35efd4/attachment-0005.pdf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: scint_toffs_20263_3_3_10.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 70856 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/d2n-analysis-talk/attachments/20100303/ec35efd4/attachment-0006.pdf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: beta-track_20263_3_3_10.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 24752 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/d2n-analysis-talk/attachments/20100303/ec35efd4/attachment-0007.pdf
More information about the d2n-analysis-talk
mailing list