[d2n-analysis-talk] Fwd: Your Submission PLB-D-14-01723R1

[Diana Parno]

Hi all,

I am pleased to report that the A1n letter has been accepted to Physics Letters B! I will keep you posted regarding final publication information.

Best,
Diana

----------------------------------------------------
Diana S. Parno
Acting Assistant Professor
Associate Director, CENPA
Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics
University of Washington
Box 354290

Email: dparno at uw.edu
Tel.: (206) 543-4035

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Donald Geesaman" <geesaman at anl.gov>
> Subject: Your Submission PLB-D-14-01723R1
> Date: March 31, 2015 at 9:10:47 AM HST
> To: dparno at uw.edu
> Cc: geesaman at anl.gov, glover at phy.anl.gov
> 
> Ms. Ref. No.:  PLB-D-14-01723R1
> Title: Precision Measurements of $A_1^n$ in the Deep Inelastic Regime
> Physics Letters B PLB-D-14-01723R1
> 
> Dear Dr. Diana Parno,
> 
> I am pleased to confirm that your paper "Precision Measurements of $A_1^n$ in the Deep Inelastic Regime" has been accepted for publication in Physics Letters B.
> 
> Comments from the Editor and Reviewers can be found below.
> 
> When your paper is published on ScienceDirect, you want to make sure it gets the attention it deserves. To help you get your message across, Elsevier has developed a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown (publicly available) next to your published article. This format gives you the opportunity to explain your research in your own words and attract interest. You will receive an invitation email to create an AudioSlides presentation shortly. For more information and examples, please visit http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides.
> 
> Thank you for submitting your work to this journal.
> 
> With kind regards,
> 
> Donald Geesaman
> Editor
> Physics Letters B
> 
> Comments from the Editors and Reviewers:
> 
> 
> Reviewer #1: 
> I very much welcome the modifications/additions to the manuscript. 
> 
> I was still not sure why in Eq. (4) it is still F2 that is used and not the absolute cross sections (in principle folded with acceptance, which was found to be quite flat). Isn't that what determines the probability to have scattered of the neutron or the proton? Possibly I am missing something here.
> 
> Editorial work:
> - line 82 and 85: as Jona-Lasinio is one person and Nambu another, I'd recommend to use different dashes, e.g., Nambu--Jona-Lasinio (would have to check the PLB style guide here), but then also consistently in Dyson--Schwinger
> - Bibliography: providing the title of the PhD theses helps a lot but might still end up in a longer search. If those theses have a DOI or URN providing them would be helpful (or even just a web link) 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Reviewer #2: I find the paper much better now; it is ready for publication in Phys Lett B
> 
> 
> 
> 
> As author/reviewer for Physics Letters B we would like to inform you that Elsevier has joined the SCOAP3 initiative, and therefore Phys. Lett. B is fully Open Access without author fee.
> You can find the official Elsevier press release at this web address: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authored_newsitem.cws_home/companynews05_02387, while the list of all selected journals can be found here: http://scoap3.org/scoap3journals.html
> 
> For further assistance, please visit our customer support site at http://help.elsevier.com/app/answers/list/p/7923 Here you can search for solutions on a range of topics, find answers to frequently asked questions and learn more about EES via interactive tutorials. You will also find our 24/7 support contact details should you need any further assistance from one of our customer support representatives.
>