======================================== CHANGELOG ========================================

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
date:   5/8/14
author: D. Flay

>> page 2, right column, end of 2nd paragraph:

   Instead of ‘in the first moment of g_1, \Gamma_1.’ I propose to
   write ‘in \Gamma_1, the first moment of g_1.’
   > Changed to 'in \Gamma_{1}, the first moment of g_{1}.'  

>> page 3, left column, 2nd paragraph, line 5:

   blank before ‘(E = ..’ missing (twice)
   > Fixed all instances. 

>> page 3, left column, 3rd paragraph, line 3:

   Why ‘found’? Shouldn’t it be ‘used’ or ‘presented’?
   > Changed to 'used'.

>> page 4, right column, 2nd last line:

   Remove period between ‘Eq. 8’ and the subsequent equation (9).
   > Changed to: 

     The background and false asymmetries were removed from the electron asymmetries according to:

     \begin{equation}  \label{eq:Acor}
        A^{e^-}_{\perp,\parallel} = \frac{A^{m,e^-}_{\perp,\parallel}-c_3A_{\perp,\parallel}^{m,e^+}}{1-c_1-c_3+c_2c_3}, \\
     \end{equation}
     
     \noindent where $c_1$ is the $\pi^-/e^-$ ratio; $c_2$ is the $\pi^+/e^+$ ratio;
     $c_3$ is the $e^+/e^-$ ratio and $A^{m,e^-(e^+)}_{\perp,\parallel}$ is the measured
     electron (positron) asymmetry.

>> page 5, left column, 2nd paragraph, lines 4-6:

   Add blank before ‘(evaluated..’ (three times)
   > Fixed all instances. 

>> Ref. [17]:

   comma missing after ‘et al.’
   > Fixed. 

>> Ref. [19]:

   remove ‘et al.’
   > Fixed. 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
date:   5/9/14
author: M. Posik

>>Table II
  
  Clarified in table caption that we used hbar c to get force units of MeV/fm

>>Fig 1.
  
  Clarified citations in Fig. 1

>> Fig. 2

  Removed ~\cite{Anthony:1999py}, since the d2n value used is found in ~\cite{Anthony:2002hy}

>> Pg. 4 top right paragraph:
   
   Added Q2 ranges for both of our <Q2> values

>> f2n extraction pg. 5:

   Added inclusion of most recent E94-010 analysis results.

>> f2n Extraction pg. 5: top right paragraph Added: 

   Our extracted $f_2^n$ value is consistent 
   with extraction found in~ \cite{Meziani:2004ne}.

>> Pg 3 top right paragraph, rephrased trigger description to:

   the main electron trigger was formed when signals above threshold
   were registered in geometrically overlapping regions of the calorimeter and gas Cerenkov

>> Summary on pg. 5:

   Our results show that f2 is much larger than d2 ,
   implying the neutron electric and magnetic color forces
   are nearly equal in magnitude but opposite in sign

   changed to-->
    
   We note that our extracted $f_2^n$ is larger than our measured $d_2^n$, implying that the 
   neutron electric and magnetic color forces are nearly equal in magnitude but opposite in sign.




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------