[Deeppwg] DIS2011 talk

[burkert]

Hi Wes,

Very nice talk. Just a couple of suggestions/comments.

slide 5: Give integrated luminosity in fb^-1 compared to previous e1e 
data. The error on baem polarization may be only statistical error. 
Systematic error is much larger. See previous analysis from eg1 data and 
others for correct estimate. You give beam energy to 1 MeV accuracy. How 
well is it really known?
  slide 9: Why do you show all 6 sectors (look very much identical) on a 
small scale rather than all sectors in one graph at a large scale.
slide 10: You have enough space, make graph bigger.
slide 11: Correct sentence ".....magnitude the the measured..." => "... 
magnitude as the measured.."
         I doubt that the 0.9% can be the total systematic error of your 
analysis. See comment on slide 5, re beam polarization.
slide 16: bullet 2 should also emphasize higher statistical precision.

Volker



On 4/10/11 10:57 AM, Wes Gohn wrote:
> Dear DeepPWG,
>
> I have linked the slides for my talk this Wednesday at DIS2011. Please let
> me know if you have any suggestions or comments.
>
> http://www.jlab.org/~gohn/gohn_dis2011.pdf
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wes
>
>