[Dsg-ft] Signal averaging

[Amanda Hoebel]

Hi Raffaella,

Yes this is possible. We will have to implement that when the system can be turned off.

Regards,
Amanda

----- Original Message -----
From: "raffaella devita" <Raffaella.Devita at ge.infn.it>
To: "Amanda Hoebel" <amandah at jlab.org>, "dsg-ft" <dsg-ft at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 2:50:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Dsg-ft] Signal averaging

Hi Amanda,
the signals with averaging looks good now and the update rate, 10 ms * 
100 samples, is very reasonable.
With this fix being already implemented, the only other thing we would 
like to add is related to how long a signal has to be outside the 
allowed ranges to trigger the interlocks: we guess right now is one 
reading while we would like to possibly require a signal to be outside 
the range for 5 sec. Would that be possible?
Thanks,
     Raffaella

Amanda Hoebel wrote:
> Hi Raffaella,
>
> The signals are read once every 10 milliseconds without averaging.
>
> Regards,
> Amanda
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "raffaella devita" <Raffaella.Devita at ge.infn.it>
> To: "Amanda Hoebel" <amandah at jlab.org>, "dsg-ft" <dsg-ft at jlab.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 1:42:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dsg-ft] Signal averaging
>
> Hi Amanda,
> what is the readout rate?
> Thanks,
>       Raffaella
>
> Amanda Hoebel wrote:
>> Hi Raffaella,
>>
>> We turned signal averaging on for 100 samples. The temperature signal looks much more stable. Let us know if this value should be changed.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Amanda
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dsg-ft mailing list
>> Dsg-ft at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-ft
> _______________________________________________
> Dsg-ft mailing list
> Dsg-ft at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-ft