<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Hi Amanda,<br>
given the difficulties in accessing the back of the calorimeter, I
think the single-point sensor would be more suitable. I have a few
questions:<br>
- how big is the sensor and how should that be connected to the
surface where we want to check for condensation;<br>
- how long can the cable between the sensor and the box be ?<br>
- how big is the box and where could be located?<br>
Pete mentioned that, to use this sensor, it would be necessary to
measure the local temperature: I know we are using all the inputs of
one CRio RTD module, but I checked and we actually bought two of
them when we purchased all the hardware so there should a second
module completely free.<br>
Best regards,<br>
Raffaella<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Amanda Hoebel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1613384202.3570668.1502809218413.JavaMail.zimbra@jlab.org">
<pre wrap="">Hi Raffaella,
Attached are pictures of two Greystone WD-100 water detection units we discussed to detect condensation outside of the calorimeter. One has a detection cable of 4.5 feet long. This unit will detect water anywhere along the wire and can be used to detect condensation at one location or multiple locations. The other unit has a single-point sensor. Please let me know what you think of these units.
Regards,
Amanda </pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Dsg-ft mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Dsg-ft@jlab.org">Dsg-ft@jlab.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-ft">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-ft</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>