[Dsg-hallb_magnets] request to stop Torus LV cRIO for debugging on morning of 2016-01-04

[Tyler Lemon]

Hello Ruben and Dave, 

I am starting the debugging of the Torus LV cRIO now. A logbook entry will be made with the status of the cRIO and any notes from the debugging. 

Best regards, 
Tyler 


From: "Ruben Fair" <rfair at jlab.org> 
To: "Tyler Lemon" <tlemon at jlab.org> 
Cc: "Dave Kashy" <kashy at jlab.org>, "dsg-hallb magnets" <dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org>, "Denny Insley" <dinsley at jlab.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 11:30:40 AM 
Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallb_magnets] request to stop Torus LV cRIO for debugging on morning of 2016-01-04 

Thank you Tyler 

Ruben 

On Jan 4, 2017, at 11:27 AM, Tyler Lemon < tlemon at jlab.org > wrote: 




Hello Dave, 

There does not appear to be any overlap in the sensors you listed for the cryo control loop and the instrumentation list for sensors in the LV Chassis. The cryogenic flows should not be impacted. 

The debug of the Torus LV cRIO code should take a few hours and can start at 3:30PM today. I will post the status of the debugging in the HBTORUS logbook. 

The current, working code that is presently running on the cRIO will be redeployed at the end of the day if the solution to the nonsense Load Cell values is not found by then. 

Best regards, 
Tyler 


From: "Dave Kashy" < kashy at jlab.org > 
To: "Tyler Lemon" < tlemon at jlab.org > 
Cc: "dsg-hallb magnets" < dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org >, "Denny Insley" < dinsley at jlab.org > 
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 9:48:15 AM 
Subject: Re: request to stop Torus LV cRIO for debugging on morning of 2016-01-04 

Tyler, 
I mis-understood your previous message. 
"Can the Torus LV cRIO be taken offline tomorrow morning for a few hours to debug bad Load Cell readings?" 

I thought we currently are having bad readings not that all load cells read erroneously at the time you showed in your plots which then recovered. (software/cRIO...) 

Cryo control input parameters are presently limited to: 

Nitrogen Liquid level in the TST. LL8152CP and TP8151 

Flow through the helium circuit. FI8561 and LL8554CP 

We are also controling some DBX functions on 
PT8554 
LL8554CP 
PT8565 

Thanks 
Dave 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tyler Lemon" < tlemon at jlab.org > 
To: "kashy" < kashy at jlab.org >, "dsg-hallb magnets" < dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org >, "Denny Insley" < dinsley at jlab.org > 
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 8:58:02 AM 
Subject: Re: request to stop Torus LV cRIO for debugging on morning of 2016-01-04 

Hello Dave, 

All Load Cells were reading improperly after the last attempted update. Attached are EPICS Archive plots from November 11, 2016 showing the Load Cell values jumping to over 2x10^6 lbs. 

The LV cRIO also reads Cernox sensor and PT100 data. Looking at the EPICS Archive plots for the same time as the attached plots, all other sensors in the LV Chassis were not affected. However, there is a chance that the signals from the other sensors may be briefly interrupted while debugging code is deployed to the cRIO. Would you know what temperature sensors are used for the cryogenic flow control loops? 

Best regards, 
Tyler 


From: "Dave Kashy" < kashy at jlab.org > 
To: "Tyler Lemon" < tlemon at jlab.org > 
Cc: "dsg-hallb magnets" < dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org >, "Denny Insley" < dinsley at jlab.org > 
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 8:00:12 AM 
Subject: Re: request to stop Torus LV cRIO for debugging on morning of 2016-01-04 

Hi Tyler, 
Which load cells are reading improperly? 
I looked through them this moring and time histories over the last 5 weeks and see nothing wrong. 
I don't have a problem with you taking down the system as long as the cryogenic flows are not impacted. 
None of the control loops use any force or strain readings. 

Dave 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tyler Lemon" < tlemon at jlab.org > 
To: "dsg-hallb magnets" < dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org >, "kashy" < kashy at jlab.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 4:39:02 PM 
Subject: request to stop Torus LV cRIO for debugging on morning of 2016-01-04 

Hello Dave Kashy, 

Can the Torus LV cRIO be taken offline tomorrow morning for a few hours to debug bad Load Cell readings? 

The debugging would be to find the cause of the bad Load Cell Values that occurred after Brian Eng made changes to the LV cRIO in November 2016 (HBTORUS Logbook entry #3438123). 

Today, at about 2:00PM, Ruben gave his okay and requested you to also approve the cRIO downtime. Please let me know if there are any tests occurring tomorrow morning where the Torus LV cRIO should not be stopped. 

Best regards, 
Tyler 


From: "Ruben Fair" < rfair at jlab.org > 
To: "Tyler Lemon" < tlemon at jlab.org > 
Cc: "David Kashy" < kashy at jlab.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 1:49:57 PM 
Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallb_magnets] request to stop Torus LV cRIO for debugging 

Hi Tyler, 

Yes - most probably but please check with Dave Kashy first. 

Ruben 


From: "Tyler Lemon" < tlemon at jlab.org > 
To: "dsg-hallb magnets" < dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 1:48:14 PM 
Subject: [Dsg-hallb_magnets] request to stop Torus LV cRIO for debugging 

Hello Ruben, 

In November, Brian made changes to the Torus LV cRIO that had to be rolled back because of issues with nonsense Load Cell readings. These issues were noted in HBTORUS Logbook entry # 3438123. 

Can the Torus LV cRIO be taken offline this afternoon for a few hours to debug the bad Load Cell readings? 

Best regards, 
Tyler 


_______________________________________________ 
Dsg-hallb_magnets mailing list 
Dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org 
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallb_magnets 




BQ_BEGIN

_______________________________________________ 
Dsg-hallb_magnets mailing list 
Dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org 
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallb_magnets 

BQ_END

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_magnets/attachments/20170104/9c25aa5c/attachment.html>