[Dsg-hallb_magnets] [New Logentry] Follow-up Re: Solenoid fast dump at 2416 A

[Ruben Fair]

Thank you all

Ruben

> On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:41 PM, Brian Eng <beng at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> I suspect most of the trips earlier were probably due to LCW issues as well, so I think it's even better looking than that.
> 
> The trip on 9/10/18 was due to incorrect QD thresholds rather than noise.
> 
> The last "real" noise trip was probably #11 on 12/18/17.
> 
> So I think once we figure out what the PV actually means to Hall B we'll have a bit more idea on what to do.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Nick Sandoval" <sandoval at jlab.org>
>> To: "Brian Eng" <beng at jlab.org>
>> Cc: "dsg-hallb magnets" <dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 1:25:10 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallb_magnets] [New Logentry] Follow-up Re: Solenoid fast dump    at 2416 A
> 
>> Awesome, Thanks Brian.  After performing the final QD threshold increase on
>> Sept10-11 we have not had another noise trip.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Tyler Lemon" <tlemon at jlab.org>
>> To: "dsg-hallb magnets" <dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org>, "Nicholas Sandoval"
>> <sandoval at jlab.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 10:58:35 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallb_magnets] [New Logentry] Follow-up Re: Solenoid fast dump
>>    at 2416 A
>> 
>> Hi Nick,
>> 
>> Have you gotten a reply from Facilities about what the lcw:92_Flow_Makeup is?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Tyler
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: "Brian Eng" <beng at jlab.org>
>> To: "Nick Sandoval" <sandoval at jlab.org>
>> Cc: "dsg-hallb magnets" <dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 10:25:04 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallb_magnets] [New Logentry] Follow-up Re: Solenoid fast dump
>> at 2416 A
>> 
>> Nick,
>> 
>> I updated the archive plots I made yesterday to include B_SOL:MPS:Status.BF
>> 
>> https://userweb.jlab.org/~beng/images/Solenoid%20Fast%20Dumps%20&%20LCW/
>> 
>> As expected that bit goes high on all the ones that we don't have a known cause
>> for, i.e. all the dumps that are only a number in the filename.
>> There are a few dumps from full field without that bit but with a well
>> understood reason, e.g. 14 & 18.
>> 
>> 10 is really the only outlier, but since we don't have any FastDAQ data for that
>> dump there's not much we can say about it.
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dsg-hallb_magnets mailing list
> Dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallb_magnets