[Dsg-hallb_magnets] 2/21 Controlled Ramp

[Amrit Yegneswaran]

the 70 s could be due to transit time/ trip initiation latency (solenoid takes more time to ack. flipped bit)... etc.
i guess relief valve installation is in the event horizon upcoming down time.

________________________________
From: Dsg-hallb_magnets <dsg-hallb_magnets-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Brian Eng <beng at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 4:49 PM
To: dsg-hallb magnets
Subject: [Dsg-hallb_magnets] 2/21 Controlled Ramp

Regarding the ramp today: https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3657129

Any ideas on why the Torus went at 14:48:24 vs the Solenoid at 14:49:34 since they should be using the same tags/values?

Also, if the flow was actually bad (according to the MPS) shouldn't we have seen the flow bit on the MPS trip?

[cid:04CBC1E1-F5DA-4197-89E1-68627AF31039 at jlab.org][cid:5C9F5D4C-894F-4BC5-AE36-A68A6F8580C1 at jlab.org]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_magnets/attachments/20190222/46bad873/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Torus.png
Type: image/png
Size: 55737 bytes
Desc: Torus.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_magnets/attachments/20190222/46bad873/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Solenoid.png
Type: image/png
Size: 54888 bytes
Desc: Solenoid.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_magnets/attachments/20190222/46bad873/attachment-0003.png>