[Dsg-hallb_magnets] Solenoid Instrumentation

[Nick Sandoval]

ZS86108US_BL_B  - we have seen in the past a few times, it's interlock is disabled.  Funny enough it just started acting up again this week, any detector work near bore?  Please see if you can eyeball the nitrogen purge and give the cable a shake.
________________________________
From: Brian Eng <beng at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 12:28 PM
To: Probir Ghoshal <ghoshal at jlab.org>; dsg-hallb magnets <dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org>; David Kashy <kashy at jlab.org>; Nick Sandoval <sandoval at jlab.org>; Denny Insley <dinsley at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Solenoid Instrumentation

For reference here's just the failures along with what is expected.

TD8522TR 0.00 K : 5 - 8
PT8565 2.31 atma : 1 - 1.3
PT8563 2.32 atma : 1 - 1.3
PT8561 1.53 atma : 1 - 1.4
TR8610 4.97 K : 5 - 6.5
PT8675A 1.10 atma : 1.1 - 1.4
ZS86108US_BL_B 2248.00 lb : 0 - 1000

PT8675A probably got rounded to 1.10 which is why it's showing up as a failure.
________________________________
From: Probir Ghoshal <ghoshal at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 10:24 AM
To: Brian Eng <beng at jlab.org>; dsg-hallb magnets <dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org>; David Kashy <kashy at jlab.org>; Nick Sandoval <sandoval at jlab.org>; Denny Insley <dinsley at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Solenoid Instrumentation

Dear Dave, Nick, Denny

Could you please the fail tags to conform the tests.
Regards
Probir

________________________________
From: Brian Eng <beng at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 10:21 AM
To: dsg-hallb magnets <dsg-hallb_magnets at jlab.org>
Cc: Probir Ghoshal <ghoshal at jlab.org>
Subject: Solenoid Instrumentation

https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3991729

Are these failures okay/expected?

If so can someone make a follow-up entry or comment saying so?

Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_magnets/attachments/20220422/e5ba20c2/attachment.html>